About: RuneScape:Featured articles/Zamorak   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

The page Zamorak is very informative, well layed out and includes a very good history and also shows all the affiliated items that people would associate with Zamorak. Also, the trivia includes very good facts and there is a sectoion for noteable induviduals which is very good. It includes alot of pictures, some of which would be very hard to find as Zamorak does not feature in the game, and overall I would give it 10/10 Cyberen 14:00, May 16, 2012 (UTC) Oppose - Per all. 03:45, May 24, 2012 (UTC) Oppose - Per Matthew. Fswe1 14:36, May 24, 2012 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • RuneScape:Featured articles/Zamorak
rdfs:comment
  • The page Zamorak is very informative, well layed out and includes a very good history and also shows all the affiliated items that people would associate with Zamorak. Also, the trivia includes very good facts and there is a sectoion for noteable induviduals which is very good. It includes alot of pictures, some of which would be very hard to find as Zamorak does not feature in the game, and overall I would give it 10/10 Cyberen 14:00, May 16, 2012 (UTC) Oppose - Per all. 03:45, May 24, 2012 (UTC) Oppose - Per Matthew. Fswe1 14:36, May 24, 2012 (UTC)
dbkwik:rune-scape/...iPageUsesTemplate
dbkwik:runescape/p...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • The page Zamorak is very informative, well layed out and includes a very good history and also shows all the affiliated items that people would associate with Zamorak. Also, the trivia includes very good facts and there is a sectoion for noteable induviduals which is very good. It includes alot of pictures, some of which would be very hard to find as Zamorak does not feature in the game, and overall I would give it 10/10 Cyberen 14:00, May 16, 2012 (UTC) Oppose - It's mostly a long list of individuals and items that are connected to zammy. There is not really much info on the page. I don't think this article is good enough to be a featured article. left:9px;top:4px;">Jleft:25px;top:3px;">Oright:1px;bottom:4px;">Eleft:2px;bottom:5px;">Yright:4px;top:2px;">Tright:20px;bottom:7px;">Jright:5px;top:6px;">Eright:2px;bottom:3px;">5right:10px;bottom:5px;">0left:6px; top:6px;">Tleft:6px;top:4px;">Aleft:8px;top:3px;">Lright:4px;bottom:2px;">K pull my finger 14:16, May 16, 2012 (UTC) Oppose - The majority of the article is just lists of people or items. The history section might be good, but we shouldn't give an article featured status for one section. I don't believe it should currently be a FA. ɳex undique 01:59, May 24, 2012 (UTC) Oppose - Per all. 03:45, May 24, 2012 (UTC) Oppose - Per Matthew. Fswe1 14:36, May 24, 2012 (UTC) Oppose - Per Fswe1. Hair 15:13, May 24, 2012 (UTC) Oppose - Per above. --クールネシトーク 19:50, May 24, 2012 (UTC) Oppose - Per above. Pkerofguthix (talk) 02:20, May 28, 2012 (UTC) Oppose - Per all File:Dragon longsword.png Cire04 TalkFile:Attack.png 01:05, June 1, 2012 (UTC) Closed - File:X mark.svg This article will not be featured. 21:01, June 2, 2012 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software