| abstract
| - Due to the nature of the Pathfinder Society, I think it best that we not post any spoilers of the scenarios until they are retired from eligible society play. If one isn't allowed to read or run the adventure before playing in it, they should not be allowed to read more than what Paizo releases in their teasers. That said, I'd also like as much info as possible about them to be on thw wiki. What do others think? - Yoda8myhead 23:19, 2 August 2008 (UTC) Agreed. -- steelwhisper 12:16, 3 August 2008 (UTC) I agree as well; hold off until the end of the season, then push to get the information up and available. I'm really looking forward to PFS. -- Heaven's Agent 12:49, 3 August 2008 (UTC) I agree as well. Has anyone considered running PFS modules online? I know we used to do it with Living City and while it generally took a little longer it was still rather fun. -- Alfred 8:52, 4 August 2008 (UTC) What if we make a yahoo account that we all have access to, and start writing up information found in PFS senarios in notepad , putting them in the breifcase, so at the end of the season it's an easy port to the wiki, or should we have enough going on with the regular stuff that it won't matter? -- cpt_kirstov 21:33, 4 August 2008 (UTC) I'll put together a template to include on all PFS scenario pages outlining our policy of holding anything beyond the basic promotional info from Paizo until the end of a season. We might even find that, if scenarios aren't "retired" every year, that it will take even longer to get them updated. But we should nevertheless be able to include the Book and Adventure Overview templates and copy/paste the adventure synopsis from Paizo into each one so that people can see the available scenarios. -- Yoda8myhead 11:02, 6 August 2008 (UTC) Maybe separate categories for active and retired scenarios? -- cpt_kirstov 12:04, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
|