About: RuneScape talk:Requests for deletion/Black party hat   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Assuming no one has any last minute objections, this VfD has been marked for "No consensus". Revert if you have anything to say. Thanks File:Rollback crown.svgearth(t) An admin has to close this. You aren't an admin. Its been decided that Wowbagger will decide if this has achieved consensus or not because he will not be biased because he has not voted. ChristineTalk 00:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC) I haven't voted, and I was the one who ruled it no consensus. File:Slayer-icon.png Gangsterls File:Divination-icon.png talk00:48, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • RuneScape talk:Requests for deletion/Black party hat
rdfs:comment
  • Assuming no one has any last minute objections, this VfD has been marked for "No consensus". Revert if you have anything to say. Thanks File:Rollback crown.svgearth(t) An admin has to close this. You aren't an admin. Its been decided that Wowbagger will decide if this has achieved consensus or not because he will not be biased because he has not voted. ChristineTalk 00:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC) I haven't voted, and I was the one who ruled it no consensus. File:Slayer-icon.png Gangsterls File:Divination-icon.png talk00:48, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
dbkwik:rune-scape/...iPageUsesTemplate
dbkwik:runescape/p...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Assuming no one has any last minute objections, this VfD has been marked for "No consensus". Revert if you have anything to say. Thanks File:Rollback crown.svgearth(t) An admin has to close this. You aren't an admin. Its been decided that Wowbagger will decide if this has achieved consensus or not because he will not be biased because he has not voted. ChristineTalk 00:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC) I haven't voted, and I was the one who ruled it no consensus. File:Slayer-icon.png Gangsterls File:Divination-icon.png talk00:48, 22 November 2007 (UTC) Closed after 3 weeks - no consensus (8 deletes and 6 keeps) as per Gangsterls Chrislee33 03:38, 22 November 2007 (UTC) Chrislee, per RS:NOT#DEMOCRACY, your "Keep ~~~~" votes no longer count. Making it 5 keeps, and its obvious that the discussion wasn't considered here, because 3 websites do not signify a widely known myth. ChristineTalk 15:50, 22 November 2007 (UTC) In all honesty, I don't think a consensus has been reached here. If we drop the precise vote count, which shouldn't matter in any event, there aren't that many more people who agree with the delete argument than those with the keep argument. In particular, it is difficult to come to agreement when the policy at hand has a debatable meaning. Once this changes, I will probably renominate at some point, as a no consensus closure indicates that the matter hasn't been completely resolved. Skill 08:13, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software