Description: The exquisite swagger worn by the highest-ranking ARMS officers. Reason: As remarked by Isobel, it woul be healthy to have some more equipped item images featured. I chose the best of the best, nominating my top five in bulk. In this case, the image's angle makes the player very impressive and intimidating indeed, and of course the clothes looks absolutely fabulous, exuding true authority.

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • RuneScape:Featured images/File:Lord marshal clothing (trousers) equipped.png
rdfs:comment
  • Description: The exquisite swagger worn by the highest-ranking ARMS officers. Reason: As remarked by Isobel, it woul be healthy to have some more equipped item images featured. I chose the best of the best, nominating my top five in bulk. In this case, the image's angle makes the player very impressive and intimidating indeed, and of course the clothes looks absolutely fabulous, exuding true authority.
dbkwik:rune-scape/...iPageUsesTemplate
dbkwik:runescape/p...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Description: The exquisite swagger worn by the highest-ranking ARMS officers. Reason: As remarked by Isobel, it woul be healthy to have some more equipped item images featured. I chose the best of the best, nominating my top five in bulk. In this case, the image's angle makes the player very impressive and intimidating indeed, and of course the clothes looks absolutely fabulous, exuding true authority. * Support - As nominator. Fswe1 08:25, August 10, 2017 (UTC) * Oppose - Set doesn't look that great File:Abyssal vine whip.png TonyBest100 File:Bandos chestplate.png 12:06, August 10, 2017 (UTC) * Mild Oppose - Set looks okay, but from an old/outdated minigame -- 12:25, August 10, 2017 (UTC) How does it matter where it's from..? Oh, and please don't write under , all righty? Thanks. :) Fswe1 18:01, August 10, 2017 (UTC) I only said that because the minigame is planned to be removed soon™, so maybe having sets that might be unobtainable in future aren't the best thing to have on featured images. Just my two cents though. And whoops, don't know how I mucked that up. -- 11:46, August 11, 2017 (UTC) I don't think that's a good reason to oppose. We already have a process for delisting obsolete images. If the minigame gets removed then the image can undergo the mandated obsolete delisting discussion, but as of right now it's still obtainable. Besides, removing Mobilizing Armies has just been floated as an idea by Mod Osborne as far as I can tell. I'm not aware of any intentions to actually remove it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Liquidhelium (talk). Would not be an obsolete image either, since the set would still be obtainable (presumably, they wouldn't just remove it from the game even if they removed MA (Saradomin forbid)). Even if they would, though, it'd be a historical image, like Xmas 2009 (which is featured). But all technical details aside, if you love the image, you should support, regardless of the source. :) Fswe1 19:37, August 11, 2017 (UTC) * Oppose - Too red and baggy. Haidro (talk) 01:22, August 13, 2017 (UTC) * Comment - Would anyone prefer File:War-chief clothing set equipped.png? It's more vibrant with wiki-esque colours and less baggy. Fswe1 12:18, August 13, 2017 (UTC) * Oppose - uggo Star Talk File:Star sprite.png 17:30, August 13, 2017 (UTC) * Oppose per star --Scuzzy Beta 17:55, August 14, 2017 (UTC) * Closed - File:X mark.svg Image will not be featured. --LiquidTalk 03:38, August 17, 2017 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software