About: Harry Potter Wiki talk:Community Portal/Archive4   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

I think that we should set up a voting system for Featured articles on the wiki just like they do on Wikipedia... Anybody agree? —Animagi/Prongs 03:51, 27 January 2007 (UTC) * Yes definately. And maybe a collaboration one too? -NighthawkLeader 05:28, 6 February 2007 (UTC) I think that can all be done here for now. There no need for subpages or anything. John Reaves (talk) 06:53, 6 February 2007 (UTC) OK, then lets just nominate any article that we feel is the best here and see how others respond... Like I feel that Quidditch is good, I've added images, and cleaned it up from its former version... —Animagi/Prongs 23:23, 6 February 2007 (UTC) Support -NighthawkLeader 07:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC) Support If there are no objections, we should go ahead and promote this article.John

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Harry Potter Wiki talk:Community Portal/Archive4
rdfs:comment
  • I think that we should set up a voting system for Featured articles on the wiki just like they do on Wikipedia... Anybody agree? —Animagi/Prongs 03:51, 27 January 2007 (UTC) * Yes definately. And maybe a collaboration one too? -NighthawkLeader 05:28, 6 February 2007 (UTC) I think that can all be done here for now. There no need for subpages or anything. John Reaves (talk) 06:53, 6 February 2007 (UTC) OK, then lets just nominate any article that we feel is the best here and see how others respond... Like I feel that Quidditch is good, I've added images, and cleaned it up from its former version... —Animagi/Prongs 23:23, 6 February 2007 (UTC) Support -NighthawkLeader 07:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC) Support If there are no objections, we should go ahead and promote this article.John
dbkwik:harry-potte...iPageUsesTemplate
dbkwik:harrypotter...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • I think that we should set up a voting system for Featured articles on the wiki just like they do on Wikipedia... Anybody agree? —Animagi/Prongs 03:51, 27 January 2007 (UTC) * Yes definately. And maybe a collaboration one too? -NighthawkLeader 05:28, 6 February 2007 (UTC) I think that can all be done here for now. There no need for subpages or anything. John Reaves (talk) 06:53, 6 February 2007 (UTC) OK, then lets just nominate any article that we feel is the best here and see how others respond... Like I feel that Quidditch is good, I've added images, and cleaned it up from its former version... —Animagi/Prongs 23:23, 6 February 2007 (UTC) Support -NighthawkLeader 07:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC) Support If there are no objections, we should go ahead and promote this article.John Reaves (talk) 03:39, 16 February 2007 (UTC) Actually, Quidditch was the FA for a while before it was changed, just check the main page on the featured article section it is listed under the recently featured spot. Oh, and I thought we were using Harry Potter Wiki talk:Featured articles for voting for featured articles. - User:Scrimgeour (Sorry I forgot to sign in, but that was me that added the above message)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software