About: Star Trek Expanded Universe:Patent nonsense   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

One should not confuse patent nonsense with: * Poorly written articles. Poorly written articles may need a lot of work to bring them up to quality standards, but they are not patent nonsense. Allow them to stay in the database and list them on pages needing attention. * Immature fragments or stubs. Sometimes a stub covers the subject poorly and seems to make little or no sense, but it is probably not patent nonsense. * Trolling. Occasionally, Trek-hating "trolls" post insulting messages to the members. Although not desirable, this is not patent nonsense. Patent nonsense is generally:

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Star Trek Expanded Universe:Patent nonsense
rdfs:comment
  • One should not confuse patent nonsense with: * Poorly written articles. Poorly written articles may need a lot of work to bring them up to quality standards, but they are not patent nonsense. Allow them to stay in the database and list them on pages needing attention. * Immature fragments or stubs. Sometimes a stub covers the subject poorly and seems to make little or no sense, but it is probably not patent nonsense. * Trolling. Occasionally, Trek-hating "trolls" post insulting messages to the members. Although not desirable, this is not patent nonsense. Patent nonsense is generally:
dbkwik:stexpanded/...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • One should not confuse patent nonsense with: * Poorly written articles. Poorly written articles may need a lot of work to bring them up to quality standards, but they are not patent nonsense. Allow them to stay in the database and list them on pages needing attention. * Immature fragments or stubs. Sometimes a stub covers the subject poorly and seems to make little or no sense, but it is probably not patent nonsense. * Trolling. Occasionally, Trek-hating "trolls" post insulting messages to the members. Although not desirable, this is not patent nonsense. Patent nonsense is generally: * Vandalism. Examples of vandalism generally include what the vandal thinks are humorous messages, or partially on-topic article fragments that distort the meaning of the subject. See: Dealing with vandalism. * Non-wikified articles. A good sign of patent nonsense is an article that is completely unformatted and contains no links to other pages. * Childish entries. Articles that are completely disorganized, of an immature writing level, and say a lot without covering more than the basics of the subject are probably patent nonsense. * Completely off-topic articles. If the article has absolutely nothing to do with the title's subject, it's probably patent nonsense. (Be careful, though — sometimes this might be an innocent mistake on the author's part.)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software