About: Brickipedia talk:Blocking policy   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Hi, Don't You Think you Should give only one Warning for Uploading inappropriate images? That Seems like a big crime to me..........crt2 I Have Returned! 01:49, February 19, 2010 (UTC) * I think it might depend on what you would classify as inappropriate. It could mean just unrelated material (eg pictures of say a tree which has no relevance to the wiki), or explicit material. If it was explicit, I would recommend an immediate block though. 03:27, February 19, 2010 (UTC) I really don't understand you people and insta-blocks (just add water!). Everyone has a bit of good in them, and giving them at least one chance is always beneficial. Ajraddatz Talk 03:30, February 19, 2010 (UTC) I still think its best to do case by case. If its just random pictures of stuff, then its different

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Brickipedia talk:Blocking policy
rdfs:comment
  • Hi, Don't You Think you Should give only one Warning for Uploading inappropriate images? That Seems like a big crime to me..........crt2 I Have Returned! 01:49, February 19, 2010 (UTC) * I think it might depend on what you would classify as inappropriate. It could mean just unrelated material (eg pictures of say a tree which has no relevance to the wiki), or explicit material. If it was explicit, I would recommend an immediate block though. 03:27, February 19, 2010 (UTC) I really don't understand you people and insta-blocks (just add water!). Everyone has a bit of good in them, and giving them at least one chance is always beneficial. Ajraddatz Talk 03:30, February 19, 2010 (UTC) I still think its best to do case by case. If its just random pictures of stuff, then its different
dbkwik:lego/proper...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Hi, Don't You Think you Should give only one Warning for Uploading inappropriate images? That Seems like a big crime to me..........crt2 I Have Returned! 01:49, February 19, 2010 (UTC) * I think it might depend on what you would classify as inappropriate. It could mean just unrelated material (eg pictures of say a tree which has no relevance to the wiki), or explicit material. If it was explicit, I would recommend an immediate block though. 03:27, February 19, 2010 (UTC) I really don't understand you people and insta-blocks (just add water!). Everyone has a bit of good in them, and giving them at least one chance is always beneficial. Ajraddatz Talk 03:30, February 19, 2010 (UTC) I still think its best to do case by case. If its just random pictures of stuff, then its different to if its from their favourite adult movie Kingcjc 12:25, February 19, 2010 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software