About: WoWWiki talk:Policy status phases   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Here is an addendum to the status and phases policy I overlooked. Some policies existed before the phases process existed, so what should we do with them? This also includes the missing rejected status which is implied by the proposal below, but not specifically described.

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • WoWWiki talk:Policy status phases
rdfs:comment
  • Here is an addendum to the status and phases policy I overlooked. Some policies existed before the phases process existed, so what should we do with them? This also includes the missing rejected status which is implied by the proposal below, but not specifically described.
dbkwik:wowwiki/pro...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Here is an addendum to the status and phases policy I overlooked. Some policies existed before the phases process existed, so what should we do with them? This also includes the missing rejected status which is implied by the proposal below, but not specifically described. Proposal: 1. * Policy pages should have an additonal status of rejected for those proposals that have lost the vote or grandfathered policies that were effectively adopted before a process was in place, but can still be recalled. 2. * Rejected – A proposal policy has some number of users that have voted no ("rejection minimum") that exceeds the number of yes votes by some amount ("rejection ratio") and a certain time period (rejection time) has elapsed for it to be rejected. This policy proposal should not appear in the . 3. * Grandfathered – A grandfathered policy has been around before the ratification and adoption process, but is adopted for the purposes of policy. This policy is officially accepted by the wowwiki community in so far as it is not recalled by a certain number of no votes in the future. 4. * Vote ratios and time: 5. * Rejection minimum – I suggest 5 votes. 6. * Rejection time – I suggest 1 week (7 days), but we could have a shorter time, like 3 days, if the rejection ratio is high (4 to 1 in against) and the number of no votes is high (15?). 7. * Rejection ratio – If the rejection minimum has been met and the no votes exceed the yes votes by 3 to 1, then the policy is has met the rejection ratio. Examples: 5 no votes & 1 yes vote, 6 no votes & 2 yes votes, etc.
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software