About: RuneScape:Clan Chat/Requests for CC Rank/King kolton9   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Rank requested: Lieutenant Hi, this is the second time I am nominating myself for a lieutenant rank. The 1st request did not reach consensus. I expect (request, and encourage, mind you) to be interrogated as much as possible in-game, or here. I believe I deserve this rank, because I fit all the requirements:

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • RuneScape:Clan Chat/Requests for CC Rank/King kolton9
rdfs:comment
  • Rank requested: Lieutenant Hi, this is the second time I am nominating myself for a lieutenant rank. The 1st request did not reach consensus. I expect (request, and encourage, mind you) to be interrogated as much as possible in-game, or here. I believe I deserve this rank, because I fit all the requirements:
dbkwik:rune-scape/...iPageUsesTemplate
dbkwik:runescape/p...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Rank requested: Lieutenant Hi, this is the second time I am nominating myself for a lieutenant rank. The 1st request did not reach consensus. I expect (request, and encourage, mind you) to be interrogated as much as possible in-game, or here. I believe I deserve this rank, because I fit all the requirements: * The user must have an account here, even if he or she never uses it. Users running for clan adminship should have it for at least 3 months. Check, I have had it for exactly 1 year and one day, and I have been using it a lot more (about every day as opposed to once a week) in the past month. * The user must be recognized in the clan chat, and must have been in it consistently for 1-3 months. Check, I am both recognized, and have been in it very consistently from (I believe) march of 2012, to now, and I intend to do so for many years to come. * Candidates should be well-known, trusted, and helpful contributors to the wiki and clan chat. Check, again. Everyone who is on regularly knows me, I am trusted, and though I do not make many edits on the wiki, again, the pace of me doing so is picking up, and I intend to do many more edits in the future. Regarding being a helpful contributor to the Clan chat, I try to help anyone as much as I can, though sometimes my help is useless (For example, things like merchanting, and how to kill high level monsters effectively). * Candidates should have been an active contributor to the wiki/clan chat for at least eight weeks to a few months. Check, I have been in and helping the clan chat for around 10 months, so I more than fit the requirement. * Candidates should have shown their ability to help other users. Check, I have done this many, many times, and as I explained above, sometimes I am useless and clueless, but I still try to help as much as I can. * If a request fails, it is generally a good idea to wait a few weeks before nominating that person again. Once that person has been around for a longer period of time they can be nominated again. This also remains the case for self-nominations. Though this doesn’t necessarily need to be here, I included it to cover all bases. Last time I had a request for rank, there was no consensus, so in the last hour I told ty (Via the Clan Chat) to just close the RfR. In it I was told I needed to mature, so over the past two months I have been slowly improving. If you want to see my previous RfR, it is in Archive 5. I, King kolton9, accept this nomination for a RSW Clan Chat rank. I have read the clan chat rules and the rank guide pertaining to my rank. I understand that this nomination may fail. If I do get community consensus, I promise not to abuse my tools because I am cognizant that this is a serious transgression. If the community finds that I have done so, my rank will be revoked, and in extreme cases I could be given a community ban. Signed, King kolton9 (talk) 02:27, December 23, 2012 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software