About: Iraq Historic Allegations Team   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

The Iraq Historic Allegations Team (IHAT) is an investigation conducted by the Ministry of Defence into allegations of abuse and torture by British service personnel in Iraq. Much of these have focused on three interrogation sites near Basra operated by the Joint Forward Interrogation Team (JFIT) between March 2003 and December 2008. The inquiry was established in November 2010 after 146 Iraqi men claimed to have been tortured.

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Iraq Historic Allegations Team
rdfs:comment
  • The Iraq Historic Allegations Team (IHAT) is an investigation conducted by the Ministry of Defence into allegations of abuse and torture by British service personnel in Iraq. Much of these have focused on three interrogation sites near Basra operated by the Joint Forward Interrogation Team (JFIT) between March 2003 and December 2008. The inquiry was established in November 2010 after 146 Iraqi men claimed to have been tortured.
sameAs
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:military/pr...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • The Iraq Historic Allegations Team (IHAT) is an investigation conducted by the Ministry of Defence into allegations of abuse and torture by British service personnel in Iraq. Much of these have focused on three interrogation sites near Basra operated by the Joint Forward Interrogation Team (JFIT) between March 2003 and December 2008. The inquiry was established in November 2010 after 146 Iraqi men claimed to have been tortured. The team is led by a former head of Staffordshire CID and is made up of both military and ex-civilian police detectives and in November 2011 numbered 86 staff. In January 2013 it was reported that G4S subsidiary G4S Policing Solutions had lost its contract to provide 40 former police officers for the inquiry, and will be replaced by Police Skills, a subsidiary of Red Snapper Group, who will provide 100 former detectives. In a judicial review the Court of Appeal ruled in November 2011 that the involvement of the General Police Duties branch of the Royal Military Police (RMP) "substantially compromised" the inquiry because members of the unit had participated in detentions in Iraq. The armed forces minister, Nick Harvey, responded by announcing in March 2012 that that the RMP staff would be reassigned and replaced by Royal Navy Police personnel by 1 April 2012. However, Louise Thomas, a former member of the inquiry team, has described IHAT as a "whitewash" and claimed that six RMP staff continued to work for it until May 2012. The Ministry of Defence announced in October 2012 that they will investigate her claims. Lawyers representing people alleging that they have been tortured applied for another judicial review in May 2012 to examine the claim that the Royal Navy Police are not sufficiently independent since they also took part in interrogations, and that abuses were so systemic and widespread that only a public inquiry will satisfy the UK's human rights obligations. The case started on 29 January 2013 and is expected to last three days.
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software