| abstract
| - Reason: I'm sorry to re-nominate it again, but it is seriously starting to annoy me that this image is STILL considered great quality? It has massive flaws for the love of god. First of all, the fog is horrible, very few images have fog make the image seem a better quality and this image certainly is not one. Secondly, some of the subjects of the image have been cut off the edge of the picture, for example, the ogre on the left. Finally, the angle is horrendous, there is nothing in the middle of the picture and makes it seem very bland. This image is terrible, lets face it. These 5 examples of images that recently failed in the voting of becoming a FIMG are clearly of significant quality in comparison to this one:
* Daemonheim boat failed due to not being special, and heavily weighted to one side. Gu'tanoth image faces the same problems.
* Har'Lakk the Riftsplitter failed for stupid reasons because the demon had wings... No legitimate reason for failure.
* Altar of Life failed just because the water looked slightly unrealistic. The pros clearly outweighed the cons in that picture.
* Maggie failed due to there not being a clear subject in the centre of the picture, one of the problems I've highlighted for Gu'Tanoth
* Odd Old Man's hideout failed due to the dull and dark colours. These clearly dominant images failed for 1 very stupid or minor error, Gu'Tanoth has atleast 3 I could name off the top of my head, probably a few more if I took the time to open the image and look correctly... This image is awful and just should not be on the FIMG template.
* Extremely strong support - As the nominator File:Broav pet.png Rhys Talk File:Completionist cape.png 07:40, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
* Extremely strong oppose - I like it and don't see a problem with it. File:Full slayer helmet.png Evil1888 Talk A's L File:Dragon platebody.png 18:45, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
* Support De-listing...this image just doesn't look stunning to me. It's a picture, but it's boring. 18:58, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
* Strongest support iv ever given to a delisting, which is very, very strong- i could take literally hundreds of thousands of images with "nothing wrong with them." the question is, is there something that stands out about them? this clearly has nothing. the ogre looks like deformed and in an odd position, the fog is ugly, theres a massive expanse of nothing in the middle, the lava is cut off, its not centered, the trees look fake and smalll, the back looks cut off, the fence looks cut off, the ogres arnt facing the camera, the globs of mud look fake, the ground looks fake, and we dont need an image of every single species in rs. File:Third-age robe top.png 3rd age farcaster File:Third-age range top.png 19:23, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
* Slight support to delist - It is a nice picture, but I feel that the center has no action in it, and that was the first place that I looked when I saw the picture. ~MuzTalk 19:26, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
* Huge support - There are numerous problems, but the huge lack of action in the middle is the one that really kills it for me. File:Mining cape.png The Last Pun Talk File:Aberrant Spectre Champion.png 03:28, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
* Very strong support - Great arguments. Fswe1 05:47, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
* Strong oppose - Sorry, my vote still stands. There's a reason why it failed 2 times. File:Farming cape (t).png Lil cloud 9 Talk 07:28, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
* Neutral - I like the image, but I absolutely hate the fog. File:Ranged-icon.png Zap0i TalkFile:Rune scimitar.png 15:13, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
* Strong support - per my previous comments on the previous nominations. bad_fetustalk 15:30, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
* Very Strong support for de-listing - Well for starters, I can't believe people think the image is high quality and secondly the fog, the ogre being cut off, the unrealistic mud the horrible angle and the fact that the image looks so bland. File:Quest point cape.png Shrodder1 File:Quest point cape.png 12:16, July 10, 2010 (UTC)
* Strong support - What I don't like about this image is that the hill to the right (the one with the ogre standing on it) seems to look flat because of the lack of fog. On the contrary, the hill on the left and the base of the hill on the right (or whatever the heck it is) do make use of fog, but the edges are still sharp and rather hideous. The plants near the foreground are cut off, and the front-most ogre's arm blends into the ogress behind it. And like many people stated above, the middle of the picture is empty. Tien 12:59, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
* Strong support - Looks uneven and just has nothing going for it besides the detail and the colors. Looks like there was no style or thought to the screenshot...It's random, ugly, and the fog/edges just cut off too much stuff. File:Abyssal whip (blue).pngxzezerxTalk HSFile:Dark bow (blue).png 21:57, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
* Strongest oppose ever in the history of everything - Per my previous discussions with this image's delisting. NO NEED TO FIX SOMETHING THAT'S NOT BROKEN... PLEASE, STOP MAKING ME USE CAPS... Anyway, this image IS OF GREAT QUALITY. Each of the nominations you listed in your reason had legitimate reasons different to what you stated. Gradius, PLEASE stop nominating this...!! --Coolnesse 23:59, July 10, 2010 (UTC) someone claiming to know the history of everything... hmm, dont see that too often. File:Third-age robe top.png 3rd age farcaster File:Third-age range top.png 00:19, July 11, 2010 (UTC) I never said I claimed it! Geez, u pplZ r t0 HARS3H. --Coolnesse 00:55, July 11, 2010 (UTC) We got the point that you think it's a good image, but please don't "berserk". File:Lol.gif As you see, half of the people here hate it and the other half does the opposite. Fswe1 07:39, July 11, 2010 (UTC) 9-3, thats hardly half and half... File:Third-age robe top.png 3rd age farcaster File:Third-age range top.png 14:22, July 11, 2010 (UTC) Oh well. File:Lol.gif If we just get rid of it, I'm fine. Fswe1 17:53, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
* Closed - File:Yes check.svg Nomination for delisting is successful. C.ChiamTalk 03:06, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)