About: Orphaned/Sandbox/Work Entry Template   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Start with a basic description of the work. Tell us what kind of work it is, the premise, why the work is interesting, or if it isn't, why it isn't interesting. There's no standard way of describing a work, but try to keep relatively neutral. Although we are a heck of a lot more casual than The Other Wiki, we don't want excessive Complaining About Shows You Don't Like or Gushing About Shows You Like on the main page. Save that for the reviews, once we get them going again..

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Orphaned/Sandbox/Work Entry Template
rdfs:comment
  • Start with a basic description of the work. Tell us what kind of work it is, the premise, why the work is interesting, or if it isn't, why it isn't interesting. There's no standard way of describing a work, but try to keep relatively neutral. Although we are a heck of a lot more casual than The Other Wiki, we don't want excessive Complaining About Shows You Don't Like or Gushing About Shows You Like on the main page. Save that for the reviews, once we get them going again..
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:all-the-tro...iPageUsesTemplate
dbkwik:allthetrope...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Start with a basic description of the work. Tell us what kind of work it is, the premise, why the work is interesting, or if it isn't, why it isn't interesting. There's no standard way of describing a work, but try to keep relatively neutral. Although we are a heck of a lot more casual than The Other Wiki, we don't want excessive Complaining About Shows You Don't Like or Gushing About Shows You Like on the main page. Save that for the reviews, once we get them going again.. Assume that the person who's reading the page has never heard of the work before. Don't write a description that only people who are already familiar with the work can understand and avoid spoilers in the main description no matter how much It Was His Sled-like it is to you. Keep the description short, you can write an Analysis in its Namespace if you want later. Neat little information you like but isn't really important can go into the Trivia Trope Namespace. Brief character descriptions are ok, but if there are Loads and Loads of Characters descriptions should go into the Characters Namespace. * TropeA: List the tropes the work uses here in alphabetical order. * TropeB: Try to make sure the trope links to the original page rather than a redirect. * TropeC: It's usually not very useful to have just to have the trope name, tell us how the trope is being used. Descriptions of the hows and whys helps us learn more about the trope and the work in question. * TropeD: YMMV and Audience Reactions go into the YMMV Namespace, not the main page. * TropeE: Tropes that are applied to characters should go in here and the respective character sheet, if there is one.
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software