abstract
| - Please feel free to edit away at this. Unlike some other MetaWiki stuff I've done, I didn't plan this page out meticulously and so you'll notice some of the language isn't that concise. I know this page will probably be a vandal's first point of call when considering what to trash (perhaps after everyone's gone through it it should be protected?), but I think its useful to have policy. I've been around when vandal's have attacked so many times and had users asking me and each other what they should do etc. The clarification I hope will be welcomed by many of our editors -- 09:33, 16 August 2006 (PDT)
* See Also: LostPedia:Reverting - 09:43, 16 August 2006 (PDT) I saw that but felt the page was silly as its supposed to be for general reverts, yet simply links to Wikipedia. Also the vandal information I felt wasn't substantial and believed it was much easier to start from scratch with my own ideas than work off of that foundation -- 09:51, 16 August 2006 (PDT) Just pointing it out. Try to make sure the articles do not contradict each other. You may want to merge the vandal info from the reverting article into this and add a link. - 10:09, 16 August 2006 (PDT) Well my ideal solution is overhauling the reverting page anyway and making it into an actual reverting guide, only this will take time to write. I think the vandal info on there should have had its own page in the first place as when I clicked the link I hardly expected to find a vandalism guide, more a general revert guide like I say which is a common question users ask -- 10:13, 16 August 2006 (PDT)
|