About: RuneScape:Featured articles/God Wars (delist 2)   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Frankly, this is a very weak page considering the tons of information that could be there. It has a relatively tiny history section and a long and very limited list of events. If every point in that list had a decent line, and there would be paragraphs about the outcome of the Wars, subconflicts etc. this would be much better. But it's deffo not up to the standard. {{Closure|Discussion dead {{Signatures/Blaze fire12}} 15:58, February 16, 2013 }}(UTC) Closed - Article will be delisted. --LiquidTalk 23:59, February 16, 2013 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • RuneScape:Featured articles/God Wars (delist 2)
rdfs:comment
  • Frankly, this is a very weak page considering the tons of information that could be there. It has a relatively tiny history section and a long and very limited list of events. If every point in that list had a decent line, and there would be paragraphs about the outcome of the Wars, subconflicts etc. this would be much better. But it's deffo not up to the standard. {{Closure|Discussion dead {{Signatures/Blaze fire12}} 15:58, February 16, 2013 }}(UTC) Closed - Article will be delisted. --LiquidTalk 23:59, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
dbkwik:rune-scape/...iPageUsesTemplate
dbkwik:runescape/p...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Frankly, this is a very weak page considering the tons of information that could be there. It has a relatively tiny history section and a long and very limited list of events. If every point in that list had a decent line, and there would be paragraphs about the outcome of the Wars, subconflicts etc. this would be much better. But it's deffo not up to the standard. * Delist - As insulator. Fswe1 16:42, January 18, 2013 (UTC) * Delist - I agree with your points. That being said, why did you decide to delist it when you could have rewritten the article based on the points you brought up here? <a href="http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/gg244/blaze_fire12/RuneScape%20Wiki%20Images/Blaze_fire.pnghttp://i250.photobucket.com/albums/gg244/blaze_fire12/RuneScape%20Wiki%20Images/12.png">http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/gg244/blaze_fire12/RuneScape%20Wiki%20Images/Blaze_fire.pnghttp://i250.photobucket.com/albums/gg244/blaze_fire12/RuneScape%20Wiki%20Images/12.png</a> 21:19, January 19, 2013 (UTC) I should do that yes, but it'll be a truly MASSIVE project. Nearly every point in that list (and it's quite extensive) could have multiple paragraphs on it. It'd take days. In other words - I need help. PLus exams are coming next week, so I won't be able to do it. I'll get to it eventually. Maybe. Ish. Either way, it's definitely not a featured article in this state. Fswe1 21:22, January 19, 2013 (UTC) Fair enough. And that's why I agree with you, it's definitely not a featured article. <a href="http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/gg244/blaze_fire12/RuneScape%20Wiki%20Images/Blaze_fire.pnghttp://i250.photobucket.com/albums/gg244/blaze_fire12/RuneScape%20Wiki%20Images/12.png">http://i250.photobucket.com/albums/gg244/blaze_fire12/RuneScape%20Wiki%20Images/Blaze_fire.pnghttp://i250.photobucket.com/albums/gg244/blaze_fire12/RuneScape%20Wiki%20Images/12.png</a> 21:24, January 19, 2013 (UTC) {{Closure|Discussion dead {{Signatures/Blaze fire12}} 15:58, February 16, 2013 }}(UTC) Closed - Article will be delisted. --LiquidTalk 23:59, February 16, 2013 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software