PLS nominee of mine. It didn't win anything, so clearly it needs work. Feedback? Saberwolf116 (talk) 17:00, July 3, 2012 (UTC) Alright, I will start out by saying that I am not a huge fan of the Review table format, so if this isn't a normal review, my apologies. I will probably be interchanging general article advice and specific fix ideas throughout. Just remember that this is one guy's thoughts, so take everything with a grain of salt. 03:49, July 21, 2012 (UTC)
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnBooks:The Case for Infinite Copyright
|
| rdfs:comment
| - PLS nominee of mine. It didn't win anything, so clearly it needs work. Feedback? Saberwolf116 (talk) 17:00, July 3, 2012 (UTC) Alright, I will start out by saying that I am not a huge fan of the Review table format, so if this isn't a normal review, my apologies. I will probably be interchanging general article advice and specific fix ideas throughout. Just remember that this is one guy's thoughts, so take everything with a grain of salt. 03:49, July 21, 2012 (UTC)
|
| dcterms:subject
| |
| Mcomment
| - This is a number that I feel like would sum up your article as of now... but I really hate giving grades like this to articles. If I were you, I would try to read some of the advice, and completely ignore all of the scores. They mean next to nothing.
|
| Pcomment
| |
| Icomment
| - The images work very well here. The second one in particular stood out to me. I like that you created the book cover for this. Right now it is a little bland, but that's probably just the graphic designer in me. The Disney logo that you found works great.
|
| Pscore
| |
| Ccomment
| - I like the concept here. For me, the article works well with the right-wing Narrator making constant comments about Communism and Socialism. I'm sure this wouldn't be the first time it was done, but that doesn't really matter to me. Execution counts for 95% of the grade in general. I also appreciate that, while the narrator says some pretty stupid things, he is saying them with some fairly intelligent prose. Again, I feel like a lot of the humor is hiding underneath the article right now. If you can get it pop out, the concept shouldn't stand in its way.
|
| Cscore
| |
| Mscore
| |
| Hcomment
| |
| Iscore
| |
| Hscore
| |
| Fcomment
| - Whatever the number to the left says, I do not really care about it. The idea for this article is definitely there. Just try and follow through with what you are setting out to do. Do not be afraid to expand on anything if you feel the need. Again, all of the ideas and critiques I gave you are only the thoughts of one guy, so take what you will from all of it. And, of course, if something in this review is confusing, or if you want me to look over any changes that you make, just leave me a message on my talk page. Happy Writing!
|
| dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| Signature
| |
| abstract
| - PLS nominee of mine. It didn't win anything, so clearly it needs work. Feedback? Saberwolf116 (talk) 17:00, July 3, 2012 (UTC) Alright, I will start out by saying that I am not a huge fan of the Review table format, so if this isn't a normal review, my apologies. I will probably be interchanging general article advice and specific fix ideas throughout. Just remember that this is one guy's thoughts, so take everything with a grain of salt. 03:49, July 21, 2012 (UTC)
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)