About: Forum:SH Archive/Article Assessment

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Forum:SH Archive/Article Assessment Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

I just want to test the water with this, and see where we can go with it before I take it to the consensus track. My idea: Article assessment, much like what they have for the specific WikiProjects over at Wikipedia. I feel that this would be beneficial, as it would give us exact specifics of where the overall project would be at. I don't know how to do all the programing, but it could easily be attatched to this:

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Forum:SH Archive/Article Assessment
rdfs:comment	I just want to test the water with this, and see where we can go with it before I take it to the consensus track. My idea: Article assessment, much like what they have for the specific WikiProjects over at Wikipedia. I feel that this would be beneficial, as it would give us exact specifics of where the overall project would be at. I don't know how to do all the programing, but it could easily be attatched to this:
dbkwik:starwars/pr...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/ZjmUpmCR9BH_hwvVK8NkTg== dbkwik:resource/WWVenAg0KMvvv-_oQTgCvQ==
abstract	I just want to test the water with this, and see where we can go with it before I take it to the consensus track. My idea: Article assessment, much like what they have for the specific WikiProjects over at Wikipedia. I feel that this would be beneficial, as it would give us exact specifics of where the overall project would be at. I don't know how to do all the programing, but it could easily be attatched to this: .... 07:18, 28 October 2006 (UTC) * What, nobody wants Article Assessment? .... 22:01, 2 November 2006 (UTC) * I'm not entirely sure what you are suggesting. - Angel BlueFile:Holocron negwt.jpg(Holonet) 23:06, 2 November 2006 (UTC) * Hang on, I'll give you a link: Talk:Laurence Olivier. See how there are templates which have a little messsage underneath them saying "This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. Well, if you go to the respective WikiProject that the template is attatched to, it will tell you how many B-class articles are covered by the project, how many FAs, A-class, GAs, Stubs, Start-class, and so on and so forth. .... 23:15, 2 November 2006 (UTC) * Sounds like a good idea long term. I think the GA/FA thing needs to be up and going first though. -Fnlayson 23:25, 2 November 2006 (UTC) * ...we've got GAs and FAs. .... 00:15, 3 November 2006 (UTC) * The proposal to tie FA and GA together is not going though. -Fnlayson 00:23, 3 November 2006 (UTC) * They don't have to be tied together. Have a look through the Wikipedia equivilant I posted a link to. .... 00:51, 3 November 2006 (UTC) * They don't, but my opinion is that should be sorted out first. You need not agree. -Fnlayson 20:30, 3 November 2006 (UTC) * Yes, I will start working on article assessment once I tie the GA and FA together. =) --Imp 20:32, 3 November 2006 (UTC) * Oh, right, I didn't quite understand what was being sai

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software