About: Articles for deletion/Advertising operations   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Notability as a distinct article. Wikipedia has extensive articles on advertising and marketing. The author who created this has three edits to his credit: creating the page, creating the talk page for his article, and making one other minor edit to this article. Jprg1966 (talk) 16:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Articles for deletion/Advertising operations
rdfs:comment
  • Notability as a distinct article. Wikipedia has extensive articles on advertising and marketing. The author who created this has three edits to his credit: creating the page, creating the talk page for his article, and making one other minor edit to this article. Jprg1966 (talk) 16:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:speedydelet...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Notability as a distinct article. Wikipedia has extensive articles on advertising and marketing. The author who created this has three edits to his credit: creating the page, creating the talk page for his article, and making one other minor edit to this article. Jprg1966 (talk) 16:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 6 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 6 June 2012 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 12 June 2012 (UTC) * Weak delete Does this denote anything distinct from marketing, advertising, etc? Recruitment is an industry full of buzzwords, but we don't need to have an article on all of them. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:25, 12 June 2012 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 14:33, 19 June 2012 (UTC) * Delete The article itself even says that the expression has no clear meaning. Kitfoxxe (talk) 19:23, 19 June 2012 (UTC) * Delete. The article implies that the term is in broad use but I found no evidence of that, or even (as noted above) consensus as to its meaning. Dictionary definition issues would apply if there was consensus; as it is, it just doesn't seem to be notabile. Ubelowme (talk) 20:13, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software