When Marcus Aurelius Antoninus Theodorus came to power in 395, the empire stood at a historic peak. Although its decline over the coming decades would not be serious, Rome would not recover until expansionism was reignited by a foreign invasion. As the first Caesar not adopted by his predecessor, Aurelius was regarded with a degree of concern by the Senate, who had come to regard adoption as an effective mode of succession and a far cry from the type of monarchy that was still stigmatized in Rome. Faustilon had a sufficiently good reputation - he was not acclaimed as sapiens (the wise) for nothing - that his decision was not only permitted but tolerated by the Senate and people of Rome. However, history takes a harsher view of Aurelius, regarding his reign as a black mark on Christian tole
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdfs:label
| |
rdfs:comment
| - When Marcus Aurelius Antoninus Theodorus came to power in 395, the empire stood at a historic peak. Although its decline over the coming decades would not be serious, Rome would not recover until expansionism was reignited by a foreign invasion. As the first Caesar not adopted by his predecessor, Aurelius was regarded with a degree of concern by the Senate, who had come to regard adoption as an effective mode of succession and a far cry from the type of monarchy that was still stigmatized in Rome. Faustilon had a sufficiently good reputation - he was not acclaimed as sapiens (the wise) for nothing - that his decision was not only permitted but tolerated by the Senate and people of Rome. However, history takes a harsher view of Aurelius, regarding his reign as a black mark on Christian tole
|
dcterms:subject
| |
dbkwik:alt-history...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
dbkwik:althistory/...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
abstract
| - When Marcus Aurelius Antoninus Theodorus came to power in 395, the empire stood at a historic peak. Although its decline over the coming decades would not be serious, Rome would not recover until expansionism was reignited by a foreign invasion. As the first Caesar not adopted by his predecessor, Aurelius was regarded with a degree of concern by the Senate, who had come to regard adoption as an effective mode of succession and a far cry from the type of monarchy that was still stigmatized in Rome. Faustilon had a sufficiently good reputation - he was not acclaimed as sapiens (the wise) for nothing - that his decision was not only permitted but tolerated by the Senate and people of Rome. However, history takes a harsher view of Aurelius, regarding his reign as a black mark on Christian tolerance despite its obvious positive effects on the demographics of the Church.
|