rdfs:comment
| - People do have this surname, but there is nothing notable about it. SL93 (talk) 16:25, 2 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
* I'm not seeing the issue here. How about Kowalski? Unscintillating (talk) 00:46, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
* Um, how about WP:N? That article is acceptable because it disambiguates notable people with that surname. SL93 (talk) 03:40, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
* Redirect: to Kowalski, per precedent of several other variations of names pbp 04:22, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
* Redirect: to Kowalski, as it is recognized as a variant of this name. Grillo7 (talk) 18:55, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
* My problem is that the article says possibly which is itself unreferenced.
|
abstract
| - People do have this surname, but there is nothing notable about it. SL93 (talk) 16:25, 2 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
* I'm not seeing the issue here. How about Kowalski? Unscintillating (talk) 00:46, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
* Um, how about WP:N? That article is acceptable because it disambiguates notable people with that surname. SL93 (talk) 03:40, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
* Redirect: to Kowalski, per precedent of several other variations of names pbp 04:22, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
* Redirect: to Kowalski, as it is recognized as a variant of this name. Grillo7 (talk) 18:55, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
* My problem is that the article says possibly which is itself unreferenced. SL93 (talk) 04:25, 4 June 2012 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 9 June 2012 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →TSU tp* 06:55, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
|