Rewritten again, I think the content looks a little low, but I had to cut alot out based on the reviews and rewrite everything.. 10:58, 12 March 2009 (UTC) WOOHOO!!! --. 12:25, 20 March 2009 (UTC) You're way too easy to please to be fun... O.o 13:39, 20 Mar I've been waiting ages, I'm not really, I was hoping for 50 :p, I'll rewrite it (again) this weekend, I've been at work and really tired on a lunch break previously so after sleep you'll be very amazed. --. 13:54, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Uncyclopedia Cures Cancer (3rd time lucky)
|
| rdfs:comment
| - Rewritten again, I think the content looks a little low, but I had to cut alot out based on the reviews and rewrite everything.. 10:58, 12 March 2009 (UTC) WOOHOO!!! --. 12:25, 20 March 2009 (UTC) You're way too easy to please to be fun... O.o 13:39, 20 Mar I've been waiting ages, I'm not really, I was hoping for 50 :p, I'll rewrite it (again) this weekend, I've been at work and really tired on a lunch break previously so after sleep you'll be very amazed. --. 13:54, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
|
| dcterms:subject
| |
| Mcomment
| - I really can't think of anything exceptionally good to say, nor exceptionally bad about this article on a short notice. Longer notice, it's a little nondescript, without any surprise or climax of a gag, so it falls a little flat in it's predictability. Hard to explain this one, though.
|
| Pcomment
| - Not quite as high brow enthusiastic as most science news articles these days. One bigger concern however is the whole prose bit. Spelling and grammar are okay, but on a relatively juvenile level of maturity, which means it looks too fast like what it is, a spoof. No surprises of any sort.
|
| Icomment
| - Relatively average, this one. Not too brilliant, not too bad. The images are supporting the article, but don't add any visual gags per se, and the captions aren't splendidly funny.
|
| Pscore
| |
| Ccomment
| - The concept itself is amusing, especially if the original reason for the article came from the quote “tumours can be huffed” or similar in a “serious” newspaper... :D
However it feels like though the original idea has potential for brilliance, the text itself conveys a slight tendency to taking shortcuts vs. actually bothering to think every bit about the whole story through. It's a good start, and admins bumbling around drunk on Hawaii sounds like an almost plausible scenario, especially with rumours of last night's events still fresh in my mind... :P
|
| Cscore
| |
| Hcomment
| - Hmm... I'm not entirely rolling off my chair here. Funny, but not hilarious. I know I should try to elaborate, but it's hard to pinpoint it o.O
|
| Iscore
| |
| Hscore
| |
| Fcomment
| - All in all, relatively average article, higher points for decent execution and some thought that has gone into rewriting it, but still not a shining new gem. :)
|
| dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| Signature
| - Luvvy/sig2 (13:39, 20 Mar)
|
| abstract
| - Rewritten again, I think the content looks a little low, but I had to cut alot out based on the reviews and rewrite everything.. 10:58, 12 March 2009 (UTC) WOOHOO!!! --. 12:25, 20 March 2009 (UTC) You're way too easy to please to be fun... O.o 13:39, 20 Mar I've been waiting ages, I'm not really, I was hoping for 50 :p, I'll rewrite it (again) this weekend, I've been at work and really tired on a lunch break previously so after sleep you'll be very amazed. --. 13:54, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)