About: FFXIclopedia:AfD Discussions/Image:Tracer Antlion.jpg

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: FFXIclopedia:AfD Discussions/Image:Tracer Antlion.jpg Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Delete: Duplicate image, a better one already exists under [[Image:Tracerantlion.png]]. --Charitwo 12:36, 15 March 2007 (EDT) Image:Tracerantlion.png[[Image:Tracer Antlion.jpg]] Keep: Again, the second one is brighter and more clear. --Mierin 14:16, 15 March 2007 (EDT) Comment: You got your images reversed Mierin, this image being proposed for deletion is in fact the second one. --Charitwo 14:20, 15 March 2007 (EDT) Comment: I think he got it right. That's why he's saying to keep the second one, since it was the one proposed for deletion. :D --Divisortheory 14:25, 15 March 2007 (EDT)

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	FFXIclopedia:AfD Discussions/Image:Tracer Antlion.jpg
rdfs:comment	Delete: Duplicate image, a better one already exists under [[Image:Tracerantlion.png]]. --Charitwo 12:36, 15 March 2007 (EDT) Image:Tracerantlion.png[[Image:Tracer Antlion.jpg]] Keep: Again, the second one is brighter and more clear. --Mierin 14:16, 15 March 2007 (EDT) Comment: You got your images reversed Mierin, this image being proposed for deletion is in fact the second one. --Charitwo 14:20, 15 March 2007 (EDT) Comment: I think he got it right. That's why he's saying to keep the second one, since it was the one proposed for deletion. :D --Divisortheory 14:25, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
dcterms:subject	AfD Discussions
abstract	Delete: Duplicate image, a better one already exists under [[Image:Tracerantlion.png]]. --Charitwo 12:36, 15 March 2007 (EDT) Image:Tracerantlion.png[[Image:Tracer Antlion.jpg]] Keep: Again, the second one is brighter and more clear. --Mierin 14:16, 15 March 2007 (EDT) Comment: You got your images reversed Mierin, this image being proposed for deletion is in fact the second one. --Charitwo 14:20, 15 March 2007 (EDT) Comment: I think he got it right. That's why he's saying to keep the second one, since it was the one proposed for deletion. :D --Divisortheory 14:25, 15 March 2007 (EDT) Commenet: The bottom one is better, and of the two, should be the one that remains. --Mierin 14:27, 15 March 2007 (EDT) Comment: Not so fast, Kaiba. This is the same issue with the troll, the second one has copyright and PC branding and the contrast is too high. The first one is sharper, centered, and features none of the aforementioned. --Charitwo 14:29, 15 March 2007 (EDT) Comment: I wasn't offering an opinion about whether or not to keep it >.> Just saying I don't think he mixed up the images. --Divisortheory 14:29, 15 March 2007 (EDT) Comment: My comment was directed at Mierin. --Charitwo 14:34, 15 March 2007 (EDT) Reversal - Delete: Lol, didn't even see the PC in the back there. Next time say that. You only said the other one is better, and but for the PC in the pic, the second is far superior. Copyright is fine. That's an SE thing. I find nothing wrong with high contrast. It allows me to see the mob more clearly. The first one is dark and barely recognizable. I'm not a fan of images that look like they've been cropped. I prefer whole screen shots. But, as I said, b/c of the PC, the second should be deleted now, imo. --Mierin 14:34, 15 March 2007 (EDT) Comment: I would think that would be noticable, but nonetheless, once I get the chance, I'll take the first image and up the brightness so that everyone is happy. If somebody else doesn't get to it first. --Charitwo 14:37, 15 March 2007 (EDT) Resolution - Delete: Duplicate image, this one being of poorer quality. --Chrisjander 00:58, 15 April 2007 (EDT)

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software