About: PvXwiki talk:You are valuable   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Well, any objections to have a PvX policy to deal with these situations? We've got to start adopting our own policies sooner or later. - Image:Kowal.jpg Krowman {{sysop}} 07:52, 1 August 2007 (CEST) Looks good to me. —ǥȓɩηɔɧ〚₮/ḉ〛 08:19, 1 August 2007 (CEST) To deal with what situations? I'm not sure if this needs policy status, but it doesn't hurt. So: support. Should however not be made official before PvXwiki:Editing_and_Archiving_Discussion_Pages, otherwise it looks like this one regulates editing of posts on talk pages. – HHHIPPO ‹sysop› 16:31, 2 August 2007 (CEST) Yes, that was one of specific situations I intended this to deal with. The archiving policy was proposed after this one to deal with them in greater detail. - Image:Kowal.jpg Krowman {{sysop}} 19:17, 2 August 2007 (CE

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • PvXwiki talk:You are valuable
rdfs:comment
  • Well, any objections to have a PvX policy to deal with these situations? We've got to start adopting our own policies sooner or later. - Image:Kowal.jpg Krowman {{sysop}} 07:52, 1 August 2007 (CEST) Looks good to me. —ǥȓɩηɔɧ〚₮/ḉ〛 08:19, 1 August 2007 (CEST) To deal with what situations? I'm not sure if this needs policy status, but it doesn't hurt. So: support. Should however not be made official before PvXwiki:Editing_and_Archiving_Discussion_Pages, otherwise it looks like this one regulates editing of posts on talk pages. – HHHIPPO ‹sysop› 16:31, 2 August 2007 (CEST) Yes, that was one of specific situations I intended this to deal with. The archiving policy was proposed after this one to deal with them in greater detail. - Image:Kowal.jpg Krowman {{sysop}} 19:17, 2 August 2007 (CE
dbkwik:pvx/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Well, any objections to have a PvX policy to deal with these situations? We've got to start adopting our own policies sooner or later. - Image:Kowal.jpg Krowman {{sysop}} 07:52, 1 August 2007 (CEST) Looks good to me. —ǥȓɩηɔɧ〚₮/ḉ〛 08:19, 1 August 2007 (CEST) To deal with what situations? I'm not sure if this needs policy status, but it doesn't hurt. So: support. Should however not be made official before PvXwiki:Editing_and_Archiving_Discussion_Pages, otherwise it looks like this one regulates editing of posts on talk pages. – HHHIPPO ‹sysop› 16:31, 2 August 2007 (CEST) Yes, that was one of specific situations I intended this to deal with. The archiving policy was proposed after this one to deal with them in greater detail. - Image:Kowal.jpg Krowman {{sysop}} 19:17, 2 August 2007 (CEST) Full support. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Image:Napalm Flame Sig Image.JPG (talk)·(contributions) 19:18, 2 August 2007 (CEST) Yay for new people! Leeroythefeared 01:05, 14 August 2007 (CEST) "The PvXwiki community prides itself on its inclusive and accepting reputation.", "...but to ensure the cooperation and good spirit that this wiki is renowned for.". Wow, this policy must be ancient. RickyImage:Ricksawsmface.PNGvantof 11:25, 5 January 2009 (EST) This is a policy...oops. Good thing GW is dead and we need all the members we can get :D Karate Jesus 11:37, 5 January 2009 (EST)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software