As a decision-making process, consensus decision-making aims to be:
* Inclusive and participatory: As many editors as possible should be involved in the consensus decision-making process.
* Cooperative: Editors in an effective consensus process should strive to reach the best possible decision for the wiki and all of wikians, rather than opt to pursue a majority opinion, potentially to the detriment of a minority.
* Egalitarian: All editors in the consensus decision-making process should be afforded equal input into the process. All users' opinions have an equal weight, and have the opportunity to present and amend proposals.
* Solution-oriented: An effective consensus decision-making process strives to emphasise common agreement over differences and reach effective decisions
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| |
| rdfs:comment
| - As a decision-making process, consensus decision-making aims to be:
* Inclusive and participatory: As many editors as possible should be involved in the consensus decision-making process.
* Cooperative: Editors in an effective consensus process should strive to reach the best possible decision for the wiki and all of wikians, rather than opt to pursue a majority opinion, potentially to the detriment of a minority.
* Egalitarian: All editors in the consensus decision-making process should be afforded equal input into the process. All users' opinions have an equal weight, and have the opportunity to present and amend proposals.
* Solution-oriented: An effective consensus decision-making process strives to emphasise common agreement over differences and reach effective decisions
|
| dcterms:subject
| |
| dbkwik:oldschoolru...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dbkwik:rune-scape/...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dbkwik:runescape/p...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| abstract
| - As a decision-making process, consensus decision-making aims to be:
* Inclusive and participatory: As many editors as possible should be involved in the consensus decision-making process.
* Cooperative: Editors in an effective consensus process should strive to reach the best possible decision for the wiki and all of wikians, rather than opt to pursue a majority opinion, potentially to the detriment of a minority.
* Egalitarian: All editors in the consensus decision-making process should be afforded equal input into the process. All users' opinions have an equal weight, and have the opportunity to present and amend proposals.
* Solution-oriented: An effective consensus decision-making process strives to emphasise common agreement over differences and reach effective decisions using compromise and other techniques to avoid or resolve mutually-exclusive positions within the group.
* Most logical: This happens when a solution appears to be impossible to execute because of the lack of support and co-operation.
|