About: RuneScape talk:Requests for adminship   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Now can we have forum sysops? If so, we should add a "Forum" section on the RFA page for that specific voting. I'd nominate myself for that, and probably not get as many opposes. http://runescape.wikia.com/images/7/7b/Cashsig.PNG 18:57, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • RuneScape talk:Requests for adminship
rdfs:comment
  • Now can we have forum sysops? If so, we should add a "Forum" section on the RFA page for that specific voting. I'd nominate myself for that, and probably not get as many opposes. <a href="http://runescape.wikia.com/images/7/7b/Cashsig.PNG">http://runescape.wikia.com/images/7/7b/Cashsig.PNG</a> 18:57, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
dbkwik:rune-scape/...iPageUsesTemplate
dbkwik:runescape/p...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Now can we have forum sysops? If so, we should add a "Forum" section on the RFA page for that specific voting. I'd nominate myself for that, and probably not get as many opposes. <a href="http://runescape.wikia.com/images/7/7b/Cashsig.PNG">http://runescape.wikia.com/images/7/7b/Cashsig.PNG</a> 18:57, 2 June 2007 (UTC) Currently, no known editor has admin powers on the new forum. Once we find out how to make forum mods (probably with the help of Wikia staff), we'll create a new section for forum mods/admins after we start the new nomination process. Dtm142 18:59, 2 June 2007 (UTC) Whiplash does.File:Yellow partyhat.png Ilyas Talk Contribs 19:05, 2 June 2007 (UTC) This isn't a wikia forums. It's phpbb and I don't think wikia has anything to do with it. Whiplash (?) installed it on the website.File:Yellow partyhat.png Ilyas Talk Contribs 19:07, 2 June 2007 (UTC) Clarification: The phpBB Forums are the offsite forums, and Whiplash created them. The Beta Wikia Forums are the brand new forum software that we have been allowed to use that is based on phpBB, and is totally separate from Whiplash's forum. Oddlyoko talk 20:19, 2 June 2007 (UTC) It seems that moderator powers now exist (I'm a forum moderator at least). I propose that all sysops are automatically given moderator powers, all bureaucrats are given admin powers, and there is a separate section on this page for forum moderator nominations. The process will be the same as the "new" nomination process. Dtm142 01:25, 5 June 2007 (UTC) No need, that exact system is already implemented directly into the forum software. B'crat = admin, sysop = mod. Oddlyoko talk 07:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC) Is it possible to mod someone without sysopping them on the main site? Dtm142 03:45, 7 June 2007 (UTC) Not with the current system. If we had that, though, I'd rather it be so that all sysops are fmods, but not all fmods are sysops. (All sysops can do fmod stuff, but regular-old fmods are limited to the forums) Oddlyoko talk 07:10, 10 June 2007 (UTC) That's how I would have wanted it too. Thanks for the clarification, that's all I needed to know. Dtm142 01:32, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software