About: Pathological shark teeth   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Over the years, certain natural 'abnormalities' have been deemed pathologies. The best example might be Gudger (1933) who attributed certain tooth variations in rays to pathologies, when they were merely the natural manifestation of file splitting.

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Pathological shark teeth
rdfs:comment
  • Over the years, certain natural 'abnormalities' have been deemed pathologies. The best example might be Gudger (1933) who attributed certain tooth variations in rays to pathologies, when they were merely the natural manifestation of file splitting.
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:fossil/prop...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Over the years, certain natural 'abnormalities' have been deemed pathologies. The best example might be Gudger (1933) who attributed certain tooth variations in rays to pathologies, when they were merely the natural manifestation of file splitting. Unlike 'file splitting', tooth germs may be injured thus creating abnormal teeth. These pathologies are likely to continue over time, showing their presence in the tooth-band. The accompanying image of a Southern Stingray reflects germ damage which could be associated with a fish hook injury. Despite the obvious deformities of these teeth, it could be difficult to distinguish these teeth if represented by a isolated fossil tooth.
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software