About: GuildWars Wikia talk:Style and formatting/Explorable areas

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: GuildWars Wikia talk:Style and formatting/Explorable areas Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Darn, I was just about to create this page. :P Anyway, some things crossed my mind: * For the "Creatures" section, would "Bestiary" (already in use in some older pages) be better considering we have ? * Do we really need the "x" and the levels for the non-combat NPCs? It feels distracting. But that's just me. * For exits and points of note, wouldn't it be better to list by the item then put in the direction? So, I'd go I can go out Exit C, which is south, rather than north is Exit A, hmm, northeast is Exit B, nope, south is Exit C, ah ok. :P * And for exits, since the list is never long, is it necessary to have subsections? Just a list of exits and directions should be fine rite?

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	GuildWars Wikia talk:Style and formatting/Explorable areas
rdfs:comment	Darn, I was just about to create this page. :P Anyway, some things crossed my mind: * For the "Creatures" section, would "Bestiary" (already in use in some older pages) be better considering we have ? * Do we really need the "x" and the levels for the non-combat NPCs? It feels distracting. But that's just me. * For exits and points of note, wouldn't it be better to list by the item then put in the direction? So, I'd go I can go out Exit C, which is south, rather than north is Exit A, hmm, northeast is Exit B, nope, south is Exit C, ah ok. :P * And for exits, since the list is never long, is it necessary to have subsections? Just a list of exits and directions should be fine rite?
dbkwik:guildwars/p...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/PEuWtURGSN4Q0E4iiVkrkA== dbkwik:resource/wWs9b737zmCZlOnSAYuGpw==
abstract	Darn, I was just about to create this page. :P Anyway, some things crossed my mind: * For the "Creatures" section, would "Bestiary" (already in use in some older pages) be better considering we have ? * Do we really need the "x" and the levels for the non-combat NPCs? It feels distracting. But that's just me. * For exits and points of note, wouldn't it be better to list by the item then put in the direction? So, I'd go I can go out Exit C, which is south, rather than north is Exit A, hmm, northeast is Exit B, nope, south is Exit C, ah ok. :P * And for exits, since the list is never long, is it necessary to have subsections? Just a list of exits and directions should be fine rite? --Ab.Er.Rant Image:Necromancer-icon-small.png (msg Aberrant80) 01:29, 19 December 2006 (CST) No one pays attention to these minute details huh? --Ab.Er.Rant Image:Necromancer-icon-small.png (msg Aberrant80) 22:17, 25 December 2006 (CST)::Unless you are two people on one account, you knew this page was going to be created since you posted in my sandbox's talk page. * Creatures, Bestiary, it doesn't really matter imo. I'll change it to Bestiary, but the argument of what has been done in the past is near irrelevant, since almost all explorable area pages have differences in them, large and small. * The symbol Image:NA-icon-small.png was being discussed regarding being changed to something less flamboyant, but no one seriously persued it. Yes, the level should be there because that's what wiki does, document even the most minute details. * The direction/exit is personal preference. In any way they are listed, it's the same information meaning the same thing. If someone can't understand directions, I don't think formatting is the problem they should be concerned with :P * Subsections was discussed in the talk for the proposal. * People pay attention and some of what you brought up above was already discussed about 2 weeks before you mentioned it here. — Gares 22:56, 25 December 2006 (CST) Oh... whoops. Guess I didn't bother looking down beyond my comment on your sandbox talk page to see the big "Exits" there :P --Ab.Er.Rant Image:Necromancer-icon-small.png (msg Aberrant80) 00:48, 26 December 2006 (CST)

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software