About: Forum:SH Archive/Swg   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Star Wars Galaxies doesn't follow cannon stuff i think everything about it should be labeled as noncannon. —Unsigned comment by Peter5158 (talk • contribs). * What exactly are you referring to that we don't already label is non-canon? See this section of the Galaxies article, which is the guideline we use for interpreting the canonicity of anything in Galaxies. And please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~)Wildyoda 20:20, 12 June 2007 (UTC) Peter5158 20:39, 12 June 2007 (UTC) SWG DOESNT FOLLOW CANON therefore it shouldnt be canon sorry about caps didnt mean to use it

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Forum:SH Archive/Swg
rdfs:comment
  • Star Wars Galaxies doesn't follow cannon stuff i think everything about it should be labeled as noncannon. —Unsigned comment by Peter5158 (talk • contribs). * What exactly are you referring to that we don't already label is non-canon? See this section of the Galaxies article, which is the guideline we use for interpreting the canonicity of anything in Galaxies. And please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~)Wildyoda 20:20, 12 June 2007 (UTC) Peter5158 20:39, 12 June 2007 (UTC) SWG DOESNT FOLLOW CANON therefore it shouldnt be canon sorry about caps didnt mean to use it
dbkwik:starwars/pr...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Star Wars Galaxies doesn't follow cannon stuff i think everything about it should be labeled as noncannon. —Unsigned comment by Peter5158 (talk • contribs). * What exactly are you referring to that we don't already label is non-canon? See this section of the Galaxies article, which is the guideline we use for interpreting the canonicity of anything in Galaxies. And please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~)Wildyoda 20:20, 12 June 2007 (UTC) Peter5158 20:39, 12 June 2007 (UTC) SWG DOESNT FOLLOW CANON therefore it shouldnt be canon sorry about caps didnt mean to use it * Galaxies is canon. Your dislike of it has no relevancy to its canon status. End of discussion. -- I need a name (Complain here) 21:01, 12 June 2007 (UTC) * in regards to the player character, i always wondered whether just one character is canon. e.g.the story of particular character (whose name/species/profession depends on the player) or if all characters are canon.(not the actual characters themselves but there being hundreds/thousands of jedi etc...) AdmirableAckbar 21:11, 12 June 2007 (UTC) Peter5158 21:06, 12 June 2007 (UTC) I used to playthe game still would if my cvomputer was better but other people in the forums of swg say it too. Peter5158 21:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC) P.S. swg was the best game i ever played yet i don't think it should be considere4d cannon * Let's drop this now, shall we? Chack Jadson 00:38, 13 June 2007 (UTC) Peter5158 11:39, 13 June 2007 (UTC) ok but what the source for this being canon and hey everyone on wookieepedia you should all try swg its the best game ive ever played * Have you looked at the Bts on Star Wars: Galaxies yet? Also, signatures usually go after comments, but there's no requirement for that. -Fnlayson 12:59, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software