About: Articles for deletion/LibNi   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Unremarkable product, self promotion. No indication of significance or widespread use. GimliDotNet (Speak to me,Stuff I've done) 10:05, 14 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 14 June 2012 (UTC) * Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. I've looked through the various Google searches and found nothing helpful. Msnicki (talk) 15:43, 14 June 2012 (UTC) * Delete or Redirect to the appropriate section of Linux, but I suspect deletion may be more appropriate. As above, I could find nothing useful on a search. Ubelowme (talk) 16:07, 14 June 2012 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be rea

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Articles for deletion/LibNi
rdfs:comment
  • Unremarkable product, self promotion. No indication of significance or widespread use. GimliDotNet (Speak to me,Stuff I've done) 10:05, 14 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 14 June 2012 (UTC) * Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. I've looked through the various Google searches and found nothing helpful. Msnicki (talk) 15:43, 14 June 2012 (UTC) * Delete or Redirect to the appropriate section of Linux, but I suspect deletion may be more appropriate. As above, I could find nothing useful on a search. Ubelowme (talk) 16:07, 14 June 2012 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be rea
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:speedydelet...iPageUsesTemplate
fontsize
  • 1(xsd:double)
B
P
abstract
  • Unremarkable product, self promotion. No indication of significance or widespread use. GimliDotNet (Speak to me,Stuff I've done) 10:05, 14 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 14 June 2012 (UTC) * Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. I've looked through the various Google searches and found nothing helpful. Msnicki (talk) 15:43, 14 June 2012 (UTC) * Delete or Redirect to the appropriate section of Linux, but I suspect deletion may be more appropriate. As above, I could find nothing useful on a search. Ubelowme (talk) 16:07, 14 June 2012 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 18:38, 21 June 2012 (UTC) * Delete Article does not establish notability after. I'm against deleting new articles for this reason, but the author and other editors have had a week to improve it. Rotorcowboy talkcontribs 18:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC) * Delete per WP:COI and lack of WP:RS The creator of this article is the creator of this product and he's promoting it on wikipedia. --Artene50 (talk) 01:18, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software