Unremarkable product, self promotion. No indication of significance or widespread use. GimliDotNet (Speak to me,Stuff I've done) 10:05, 14 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
* Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. I've looked through the various Google searches and found nothing helpful. Msnicki (talk) 15:43, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
* Delete or Redirect to the appropriate section of Linux, but I suspect deletion may be more appropriate. As above, I could find nothing useful on a search. Ubelowme (talk) 16:07, 14 June 2012 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be rea
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Articles for deletion/LibNi
|
| rdfs:comment
| - Unremarkable product, self promotion. No indication of significance or widespread use. GimliDotNet (Speak to me,Stuff I've done) 10:05, 14 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
* Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. I've looked through the various Google searches and found nothing helpful. Msnicki (talk) 15:43, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
* Delete or Redirect to the appropriate section of Linux, but I suspect deletion may be more appropriate. As above, I could find nothing useful on a search. Ubelowme (talk) 16:07, 14 June 2012 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be rea
|
| dcterms:subject
| |
| dbkwik:speedydelet...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| fontsize
| |
| B
| |
| P
| |
| abstract
| - Unremarkable product, self promotion. No indication of significance or widespread use. GimliDotNet (Speak to me,Stuff I've done) 10:05, 14 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
* Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. I've looked through the various Google searches and found nothing helpful. Msnicki (talk) 15:43, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
* Delete or Redirect to the appropriate section of Linux, but I suspect deletion may be more appropriate. As above, I could find nothing useful on a search. Ubelowme (talk) 16:07, 14 June 2012 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 18:38, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
* Delete Article does not establish notability after. I'm against deleting new articles for this reason, but the author and other editors have had a week to improve it. Rotorcowboy talkcontribs 18:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
* Delete per WP:COI and lack of WP:RS The creator of this article is the creator of this product and he's promoting it on wikipedia. --Artene50 (talk) 01:18, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)