About: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Ethiopian Library "(quick)"   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

66.253.221.223 22:19, August 20, 2012 (UTC) I'll get on to reviewing this later. Hopefully.-- 05:52, August 22, 2012 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Ethiopian Library "(quick)"
rdfs:comment
  • 66.253.221.223 22:19, August 20, 2012 (UTC) I'll get on to reviewing this later. Hopefully.-- 05:52, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
dcterms:subject
Mcomment
  • Averaged scores.
Pcomment
  • Your articles formatting is a sore point. Luckily, it's pretty easy to fix. here is a guide to proper Wiki formatting if you want to learn. The main two things for your article are the pictures and the quotes. For the pictures, upload them to the site here and place them on the article as thumb|Your caption here.. Use the quote template for your quotes; .
Icomment
  • The pictures are fine. Not much to say.
Pscore
  • 2(xsd:integer)
Ccomment
  • This the main issue with your article. In its current state, its pretty confusing - the title suggests you're going to be talking about a library, but it ends up being mostly about a war and how America are covering up the fact that Africa was once a prosperous nation. It jumps from idea to idea without really establishing which is important. I assume that the main focus of the article is that Africa is in fact an advanced nation, and you're showing this by talking about their greatest creation. The problem is that I had to read it through a number of times to come to this conclusion. You need to establish your concept firmly in an introduction. Work out what you are trying to say in this article, and make sure the reader knows this in the first short paragraph. This way they won't spend the entire time wondering what's going on. Then you need to expand on these themes. Since Uncyclopedia is a Wikipedia parody, I tend to look at Wikipedia articles for ideas on content. Look up articles on famous structures in history, see what Wikipedia says about them, and try to do something similar with your article.
Cscore
  • 3(xsd:integer)
Mscore
  • 3(xsd:double)
Hcomment
  • I actually found this a little amusing. However, it has a couple of glaring problems.
Iscore
  • 5(xsd:integer)
Hscore
  • 4(xsd:integer)
Fcomment
  • That was pretty freakin' short, but the main point I wanted to make was that you need to focus on making a clear concept.
dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate
Signature
  • --08-22
abstract
  • 66.253.221.223 22:19, August 20, 2012 (UTC) I'll get on to reviewing this later. Hopefully.-- 05:52, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software