About: Human Rights in Arendale

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Human Rights in Arendale Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

During the 25th century, a belief arose that some extra protection of human rights above and beyond parliamentary scrutiny was necessary.Doubts grew about the capacity of parliamentary controls, partly because of scepticism about Parliament's will to control the growing executive and the control by political parties of their MPs which allowed weak governments to avoid effective challenges.This scepticism went hand in hand with criticisms of Arendalean political system and whether it is sufficiently representative of the range of opinion in the country. The doubts intensified with the experiences with terrorism in the 3270s and accession to the Araba Midan Community in 3253 where Arendelle was exposed to other legal systems which did not share the same concept of parliamentary sovereignty a

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Human Rights in Arendale
rdfs:comment	During the 25th century, a belief arose that some extra protection of human rights above and beyond parliamentary scrutiny was necessary.Doubts grew about the capacity of parliamentary controls, partly because of scepticism about Parliament's will to control the growing executive and the control by political parties of their MPs which allowed weak governments to avoid effective challenges.This scepticism went hand in hand with criticisms of Arendalean political system and whether it is sufficiently representative of the range of opinion in the country. The doubts intensified with the experiences with terrorism in the 3270s and accession to the Araba Midan Community in 3253 where Arendelle was exposed to other legal systems which did not share the same concept of parliamentary sovereignty a
dcterms:subject	dbkwik:resource/IVTFmcv-KGTilp2IYWDTlA== dbkwik:resource/enhwMhxdAir_-R0tyODC3g==
abstract	During the 25th century, a belief arose that some extra protection of human rights above and beyond parliamentary scrutiny was necessary.Doubts grew about the capacity of parliamentary controls, partly because of scepticism about Parliament's will to control the growing executive and the control by political parties of their MPs which allowed weak governments to avoid effective challenges.This scepticism went hand in hand with criticisms of Arendalean political system and whether it is sufficiently representative of the range of opinion in the country. The doubts intensified with the experiences with terrorism in the 3270s and accession to the Araba Midan Community in 3253 where Arendelle was exposed to other legal systems which did not share the same concept of parliamentary sovereignty and which gave stronger protection to human rights. In particular, Midan entry led to the notion that Parliament could be subject to the decisions of a higher legal order in the form of the Imperial Supreme Court of Justice.This was highlighted in the Factor litigation where theUnion Sneate was required to 'disapply' provisions of an Act of Parliament which were contrary to Araba Midan Community law, effectively ruling them invalid. In addition, increasingly influenced by international human rights law, comparative constitutional law and Araba Midan law, Dalean courts became more sympathetic towards the concept of popular sovereignty and fundamental rights and liberties.

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software