Is the see also recommendation outdated? I personally prefer DA2 style: Mind Blast is a mage spell from the Spirit tree in Dragon Age: Origins. to DAO style: See Also Spirit Spells, Spells, Mage, Ability Mechanics. DA2 style provides a proper introduction to the article and looks better when there is also a for template. I'm thinking of updating DAO pages on spells and talents but want to know what other people think first. Mostlyautumn (talk) 22:09, August 13, 2012 (UTC)
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Dragon Age Wiki talk:Manual of Style/Talent and spell guide
|
| rdfs:comment
| - Is the see also recommendation outdated? I personally prefer DA2 style: Mind Blast is a mage spell from the Spirit tree in Dragon Age: Origins. to DAO style: See Also Spirit Spells, Spells, Mage, Ability Mechanics. DA2 style provides a proper introduction to the article and looks better when there is also a for template. I'm thinking of updating DAO pages on spells and talents but want to know what other people think first. Mostlyautumn (talk) 22:09, August 13, 2012 (UTC)
|
| dbkwik:dragonage/p...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| abstract
| - Is the see also recommendation outdated? I personally prefer DA2 style: Mind Blast is a mage spell from the Spirit tree in Dragon Age: Origins. to DAO style: See Also Spirit Spells, Spells, Mage, Ability Mechanics. DA2 style provides a proper introduction to the article and looks better when there is also a for template. I'm thinking of updating DAO pages on spells and talents but want to know what other people think first. Mostlyautumn (talk) 22:09, August 13, 2012 (UTC) Yes. Most of DAO styles have been deprecated a while ago (especially as a lot of links are redundant). This guide is outdated. It's a rather slow process to convert everything, but you're welcome to help! 23:15, August 16, 2012 (UTC)
|