About: Muppet Wiki:Notability of fan projects   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

The following criteria may be used to determine notability: * Content: For a fansites, the site must have substantial and unique content. Fan projects should be a unique, interesting, and substantial creation. * There should be something interesting to say about the item and why it's notable. * If the wiki article is almost as long as the text on the site, this is a bad sign. * If the wiki article is mainly a picture (or collection of pictures) that simply show something "cool" that a fan made, this is a bad sign. * A complete fan film is substantial; a video clip of a Muppet impression is not. * Longevity: For fansites, a site should have been in active operation for at least six months. * A fansite merely remaining accessible is not the same as rema

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Muppet Wiki:Notability of fan projects
rdfs:comment
  • The following criteria may be used to determine notability: * Content: For a fansites, the site must have substantial and unique content. Fan projects should be a unique, interesting, and substantial creation. * There should be something interesting to say about the item and why it's notable. * If the wiki article is almost as long as the text on the site, this is a bad sign. * If the wiki article is mainly a picture (or collection of pictures) that simply show something "cool" that a fan made, this is a bad sign. * A complete fan film is substantial; a video clip of a Muppet impression is not. * Longevity: For fansites, a site should have been in active operation for at least six months. * A fansite merely remaining accessible is not the same as rema
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:muppet/prop...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • The following criteria may be used to determine notability: * Content: For a fansites, the site must have substantial and unique content. Fan projects should be a unique, interesting, and substantial creation. * There should be something interesting to say about the item and why it's notable. * If the wiki article is almost as long as the text on the site, this is a bad sign. * If the wiki article is mainly a picture (or collection of pictures) that simply show something "cool" that a fan made, this is a bad sign. * A complete fan film is substantial; a video clip of a Muppet impression is not. * Longevity: For fansites, a site should have been in active operation for at least six months. * A fansite merely remaining accessible is not the same as remaining active. * This guideline can be ignored for subjects that pass other criteria by a substantial margin. * Outside coverage: The project should have received coverage from a significant outside source(s). * This includes mentions from notable third-party, published sources (newspaper, notable professional-run websites, television/radio, etc.) * This includes endorsements from official Muppet/Henson organizations or individuals. * Only being mentioned in fan forums, personal blogs, fansites or other such outlets is not enough. * For non-notable items: Fan sites is a place to list interesting web content that does not qualify for a full article, but does qualify as a genuine and unique fan project. * Simply showing up on Google or having a domain name is not proof of notability for an article.
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software