About: Articles for deletion/My Little Pony terminology

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Articles for deletion/My Little Pony terminology Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Excessive detail that is not needed for Wikipedia. The sort of page that you'd see on a fan wiki. The plot, characters, setting and other sections of individual pages are more than enough to explain these terms. Thus the page is not needed. Harizotoh9 (talk) 18:38, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Articles for deletion/My Little Pony terminology
rdfs:comment	Excessive detail that is not needed for Wikipedia. The sort of page that you'd see on a fan wiki. The plot, characters, setting and other sections of individual pages are more than enough to explain these terms. Thus the page is not needed. Harizotoh9 (talk) 18:38, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
dbkwik:speedydelet...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/U0AkhHdVz-opGxfjZaPWfw== dbkwik:resource/AIwP6M9mKWLNPXeShB468w== dbkwik:resource/G4qIUW8wKFQ2UnLJXakg9Q== dbkwik:resource/MzRCxTUSJ-iaxoaKm29D8Q== dbkwik:resource/NAXQSNOjXyS0s511Aj2IUQ==
abstract	Excessive detail that is not needed for Wikipedia. The sort of page that you'd see on a fan wiki. The plot, characters, setting and other sections of individual pages are more than enough to explain these terms. Thus the page is not needed. Harizotoh9 (talk) 18:38, 17 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 18 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 18 June 2012 (UTC) * Comment This appears to be an ill-named "World of ..." article, of which Wikipedia has dozens if not hundreds of articles: Special:PrefixIndex/World of. These kinds of articles are to succinctly bundle in-universe information in list form so that they aren't fancrufty stand-alone articles. (No advice on keeping or deleting this one from me.) – sgeureka t•c 08:11, 18 June 2012 (UTC) * Strong Keep Harizotoh9,you're always notorious on complaining at things like this and want them removed as an eyesore.Just leave it alone!--Blackgaia02 (Talk if you're Worthy) (talk) 23:52, 18 June 2012 (UTC) * Delete Wikipedia isn't a product guide nor a dictionary. This content doesn't seem to meet independent, reliable sources for WP:GNG and it seems too trivial to keep a page like this as it apparently is not important concept of the series, which IAR may be warrantied (to avoid this stuff to get their own pages). Secret account 05:43, 20 June 2012 (UTC) * Comment Tell that to Transformers. I mean they got their separate articles on EVERYTHING! WHY.NOT.THIS?? All of the people here marking my articles as delete gives me a bad mood everyday!--Blackgaia02 (Talk if you're Worthy) (talk) 09:51, 20 June 2012 (UTC) * Comment WP:OTHERSTUFF is an argument to avoid in a deletion debate. --Harizotoh9 (talk) 21:00, 20 June 2012 (UTC) * Full disclosure: I'm a brony. Weakest keep possible, I believe that most, if not all of this, is relevant, but I would tentatively support a move to "World of..." as suggested by Sgeureka. Also, a lot of this is duplicated, or could be duplicated, by articles we already have on ponies. Specs112 t c 19:59, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software