This landmark case, which superficially focused around the rights of an employer to punish a disobedient employee, was largely seen as a retaliatory case following the much less famous Gromit v. Wallace. Having been cleared of the bestial servitude of Gromit, the bias media alleged that Wallace responded by attempting to use his canine acquaintance in a series of dangerous experiments. When Gromit invoked union protection and threatened further legal action, Wallace filed a preemptive claim.
Attributes | Values |
---|---|
rdfs:label |
|
rdfs:comment |
|
dbkwik:wikiality/p...iPageUsesTemplate | |
abstract |
|