About: Battlefield Wiki talk:Article Classification   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Gold: Golden Grenade Silver: Dog Tags Bronze: ? Standard: Private Rank Stub: ? Just some suggestions, although I think Gold is already in use. CruzDude {Talk} {Contributions} File:AdminRibbon.pngFile:AwardRibbon.pngFile:UserMonthRibbon.png 05:26, October 6, 2010 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Battlefield Wiki talk:Article Classification
rdfs:comment
  • Gold: Golden Grenade Silver: Dog Tags Bronze: ? Standard: Private Rank Stub: ? Just some suggestions, although I think Gold is already in use. CruzDude {Talk} {Contributions} File:AdminRibbon.pngFile:AwardRibbon.pngFile:UserMonthRibbon.png 05:26, October 6, 2010 (UTC)
dbkwik:battlefield...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Gold: Golden Grenade Silver: Dog Tags Bronze: ? Standard: Private Rank Stub: ? Just some suggestions, although I think Gold is already in use. CruzDude {Talk} {Contributions} File:AdminRibbon.pngFile:AwardRibbon.pngFile:UserMonthRibbon.png 05:26, October 6, 2010 (UTC) Well, we can't tag every page easilly with an image anymore now that absolute positioning's gone, they have to be in-text image, which don't really work as well. If you flick through the templates though, we have colour co-ordinated stars for gold, silver and bronze and a little tag for stubs. Feel free to alter them though. - Bondpedia (Contact • Contributions) File:AdminRibbon.pngFile:800px-Template Ribbon.pngFile:UserMonthRibbon.png 13:43, October 6, 2010 (UTC) Why don't we use the rank insignias for BC2, so use File:R034.png for bronze, File:R035.png for silver and File:R036.png for gold? It's a basic idea that could work. - File:BFBC2 ta58.pngFile:P043.pngHeatedPete 17:55, October 8, 2010 (UTC) I kind of like the variety between the images of the golden grenade, dog tag, etc. SSDGFCTCT9 (Talk) 20:23, October 8, 2010 (UTC) You know standard articles shouldn't really have any classification picture....you know...cause their standard? File:F-22 Desert Raptor.pngFile:156th Tactical Fighter Squadron.pngDEathgod65 - OMDF (Contact) File:VMFA-55.pngFile:F-35A RSAF.png Well, everything needs to be classified. It's like, in a way, denying their existence if we don't classify them. SSDGFCTCT9 (Talk) 14:12, October 13, 2010 (UTC) Yeah but just adding a private rank picture into majority of pages wouldn't be meaningful File:F-22 Desert Raptor.pngFile:156th Tactical Fighter Squadron.pngDEathgod65 - OMDF (Contact) File:VMFA-55.pngFile:F-35A RSAF.png
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software