Like the Boeing XB-15, the Martin XB-16 (Martin Model 145) was designed to meet the United States Army Air Corps' request for a bomber that could carry 2,500 lb (1,100 kg) of bombs 5,000 mi (8,000 km). The XB-16 was to use four Allison V-1710 liquid-cooled inline engines; contemporary American aircraft used air-cooled radial engines. The XB-16 was cancelled for essentially the same reason the B-15 project was: it wasn't fast enough to meet the requirements set by the Army. Since both were cancelled around the same time, Martin did not have time to produce an XB-16.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdfs:label
| |
rdfs:comment
| - Like the Boeing XB-15, the Martin XB-16 (Martin Model 145) was designed to meet the United States Army Air Corps' request for a bomber that could carry 2,500 lb (1,100 kg) of bombs 5,000 mi (8,000 km). The XB-16 was to use four Allison V-1710 liquid-cooled inline engines; contemporary American aircraft used air-cooled radial engines. The XB-16 was cancelled for essentially the same reason the B-15 project was: it wasn't fast enough to meet the requirements set by the Army. Since both were cancelled around the same time, Martin did not have time to produce an XB-16.
|
sameAs
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
dbkwik:military/pr...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
performance header
| |
Max weight main
| - ** Original design: 65,000 lb
** 1935 redesign: 104,880 lb
|
number of props
| |
type of props
| - liquid-cooled V12 engines
|
length alt
| |
span main
| - ** Original design: 140 ft
|
power/mass alt
| |
cruise speed main
| |
cruise speed alt
| |
height alt
| |
loading main
| |
range alt
| |
length main
| |
area main
| |
power main
| |
height main
| |
span alt
| |
range main
| |
max speed main
| |
engine (prop)
| |
power/mass main
| |
empty weight main
| - ** Original design: 31,957 lb
** 1935 redesign: 50,660 lb
|
area alt
| |
max speed alt
| |
jet or prop?
| |
loading alt
| |
empty weight alt
| |
plane or copter?
| |
Crew
| |
abstract
| - Like the Boeing XB-15, the Martin XB-16 (Martin Model 145) was designed to meet the United States Army Air Corps' request for a bomber that could carry 2,500 lb (1,100 kg) of bombs 5,000 mi (8,000 km). The XB-16 was to use four Allison V-1710 liquid-cooled inline engines; contemporary American aircraft used air-cooled radial engines. In 1935, Martin revised the XB-16 design. The wing span was increased from 140 ft (42.7 m) to 173 ft (52.7 m), and a set of V-1710 engines added to the trailing edge. This version had a wingspan 20% greater than that of the B-29 Superfortress, the first operational bomber that would fill the role intended for the XB-16. The XB-16 was cancelled for essentially the same reason the B-15 project was: it wasn't fast enough to meet the requirements set by the Army. Since both were cancelled around the same time, Martin did not have time to produce an XB-16.
|