About: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Bunny Shark

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Bunny Shark Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

192.216.61.102 16:53, 20 March 2009 (UTC) Is this a serious demand for a review? I've seen predictions made by Nostradamus less random than this stublike article. If it's a serious request for help and constructiv comments I hope you get it but otherwise I would almost go as far as to flag this for VFD. No offense and I don't mean to sound harsh but its really random and is quite low on content. Pls let me know. -- 18:08 22 March every article deserves at least a look... 21:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Bunny Shark
rdfs:comment	192.216.61.102 16:53, 20 March 2009 (UTC) Is this a serious demand for a review? I've seen predictions made by Nostradamus less random than this stublike article. If it's a serious request for help and constructiv comments I hope you get it but otherwise I would almost go as far as to flag this for VFD. No offense and I don't mean to sound harsh but its really random and is quite low on content. Pls let me know. -- 18:08 22 March every article deserves at least a look... 21:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
dcterms:subject	Reviewed
Mcomment	averaged via magic
Pcomment	you have no links. your grammar and spelling weren't terrible, but they weren't great. overall this was short and wandering.
Icomment	only the one image...and it's very weird and disturbing, i don't know why.
Pscore	4(xsd:integer)
Ccomment	1(xsd:integer)
Cscore	1(xsd:integer)
Mscore	2(xsd:double)
Hcomment	well you've fallen into the trap of a really, really random article. you seem to have made up an animal and given it bizarre and nonsensical characteristics, such as eating carrots that grow in pink water. the article confuses the reader more than anything else, and it lacks in humor quite a bit. if you're going to insist on hving an article on this 'bunny shark', then try to take a more serious tone and describe it as if it were an actual animal.
Iscore	3(xsd:integer)
Hscore	1(xsd:integer)
Fcomment	your final score is 11.3. this isn't an acceptable article on uncyc, and will likely fall victim to a hungry admin's delete button within a week, especially since you are an IP and your last edit was creating this pee review page. nevertheless, i retain some slim ray of hope that you will return and begin anew on this article . i suggest coming up with some believeable fake details about this...thing, and giving your article an encyclopedic tone. good luck.
dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/DsPt5TCVehaFDqGyrFCaPA== dbkwik:resource/yFN67gnsWPKFr390CT1mxA==
Signature	--03-31
abstract	192.216.61.102 16:53, 20 March 2009 (UTC) Is this a serious demand for a review? I've seen predictions made by Nostradamus less random than this stublike article. If it's a serious request for help and constructiv comments I hope you get it but otherwise I would almost go as far as to flag this for VFD. No offense and I don't mean to sound harsh but its really random and is quite low on content. Pls let me know. -- 18:08 22 March every article deserves at least a look... 21:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software