About: Halo Nation:Standards Council of Halopedia/Bi-Election

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Halo Nation:Standards Council of Halopedia/Bi-Election Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

With the vote currently sitting at 39/4,1,1, and recognizing that we need to have our Senators fully elected for when this group goes active, I'd like to suggest we hold a bi-election now with it being closed at the same time the RfU is. The term for these Senators is until the next general usergroup elections Ok, normally we have two requirements for voting 1. * Qualifies by the voting policy (50 edits, 1 month in Halopedia) 2. * Is a member of the usergroup

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Halo Nation:Standards Council of Halopedia/Bi-Election
rdfs:comment	With the vote currently sitting at 39/4,1,1, and recognizing that we need to have our Senators fully elected for when this group goes active, I'd like to suggest we hold a bi-election now with it being closed at the same time the RfU is. The term for these Senators is until the next general usergroup elections Ok, normally we have two requirements for voting 1. * Qualifies by the voting policy (50 edits, 1 month in Halopedia) 2. * Is a member of the usergroup
dbkwik:halo/proper...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/Q9EYjLrNw5h_ia-_1xLvyA== dbkwik:resource/_oFVzb_1tiqASSSM_LG6Tw== dbkwik:resource/nzfFneESzYvGgi3aCgGknw==
abstract	With the vote currently sitting at 39/4,1,1, and recognizing that we need to have our Senators fully elected for when this group goes active, I'd like to suggest we hold a bi-election now with it being closed at the same time the RfU is. The term for these Senators is until the next general usergroup elections Ok, normally we have two requirements for voting 1. * Qualifies by the voting policy (50 edits, 1 month in Halopedia) 2. * Is a member of the usergroup Since no one is a member of the usergroup yet, I'm suggesting a modified rule: anyone who's voted on the SCoH RfU (regardless of position) is eligible. They still must meet the requirements of the voting policy, but they had to do that to vote on the RfU anyways. If you want to vote but can't because you haven't voted on the RfU, BUT you don't have a position, you can simply mark yourself down as neutral. All other usergroup election rules apply The election has been extended to Saturday evening due to lack of interest prior to the passing of the RfU --forgottenlord 00:23, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software