About: RuneScape talk:WikiGuilds/Citers' Guild/Archive 1   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Do we need this? Since we are "archiving" dev blogs in our wiki, why we would we want to use external links to link to Jagex's version of the blogs? Our diaries are better in a sense, since we can add wikilinks and such. az talk 13:10, November 8, 2009 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • RuneScape talk:WikiGuilds/Citers' Guild/Archive 1
rdfs:comment
  • Do we need this? Since we are "archiving" dev blogs in our wiki, why we would we want to use external links to link to Jagex's version of the blogs? Our diaries are better in a sense, since we can add wikilinks and such. az talk 13:10, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
dbkwik:rune-scape/...iPageUsesTemplate
dbkwik:runescape/p...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Do we need this? Since we are "archiving" dev blogs in our wiki, why we would we want to use external links to link to Jagex's version of the blogs? Our diaries are better in a sense, since we can add wikilinks and such. az talk 13:10, November 8, 2009 (UTC) Well, it can't hurt. We can always put the dev blogs down as a reference as well as linking to our own. Linking to an actual page on Jagex's site lends some extra credibility, I see that the dev blog pages here on the wiki don't link there. I don't demand that it stays, but I don't see any reason it should go. Psycho Robot talkFile:Silver bar.png 17:58, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software