Support: Comprehensive and detailed, covers all topics related to the article, yet is not confusing to readers. Has navigation template for easy access to individual stages. No SPG errors. --bewnt 04:06, 7 January 2009 (UTC) Support: I agree. All important stuff is covered, it has a good structure and it looks nice. One of the better articles. --Justme2 15:16, 7 January 2009 (UTC) Support: I agree. This is a well-put-together article and deserves attention. --Buggy793 Image:Green Smiley Fish.png Talk! 01:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Dan-Ball Wiki talk:Featured articles
|
| rdfs:comment
| - Support: Comprehensive and detailed, covers all topics related to the article, yet is not confusing to readers. Has navigation template for easy access to individual stages. No SPG errors. --bewnt 04:06, 7 January 2009 (UTC) Support: I agree. All important stuff is covered, it has a good structure and it looks nice. One of the better articles. --Justme2 15:16, 7 January 2009 (UTC) Support: I agree. This is a well-put-together article and deserves attention. --Buggy793 Image:Green Smiley Fish.png Talk! 01:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
|
| dbkwik:danball/pro...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| abstract
| - Support: Comprehensive and detailed, covers all topics related to the article, yet is not confusing to readers. Has navigation template for easy access to individual stages. No SPG errors. --bewnt 04:06, 7 January 2009 (UTC) Support: I agree. All important stuff is covered, it has a good structure and it looks nice. One of the better articles. --Justme2 15:16, 7 January 2009 (UTC) Support: I agree. This is a well-put-together article and deserves attention. --Buggy793 Image:Green Smiley Fish.png Talk! 01:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC) Support I agree since, quite honestly, I can't think of anything better. Can we make a final decision now? Combak 02:37, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
|