About: RuneScape:Featured images/File:Zemourgeral's Fort HighRes.png   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

[[File:Zemourgeral's_Fort_HighRes.png|250x250px|right]] Description: The Fortress of the evil Mahjarrat Zemouregal. Reason: Replacement of this image. It's taken with the OoO, has MSAA x4 and I manually removed badly AA done by Jagex's algorythm =P, it also has a nice screensaver res. EDIT: For the ones saying "I don't like the angle", its about THE QUALITY, I had to tilt the camera to show the full building, I'm only doing this because I can't directly replace the image.

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • RuneScape:Featured images/File:Zemourgeral's Fort HighRes.png
rdfs:comment
  • [[File:Zemourgeral's_Fort_HighRes.png|250x250px|right]] Description: The Fortress of the evil Mahjarrat Zemouregal. Reason: Replacement of this image. It's taken with the OoO, has MSAA x4 and I manually removed badly AA done by Jagex's algorythm =P, it also has a nice screensaver res. EDIT: For the ones saying "I don't like the angle", its about THE QUALITY, I had to tilt the camera to show the full building, I'm only doing this because I can't directly replace the image.
dbkwik:rune-scape/...iPageUsesTemplate
dbkwik:runescape/p...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • [[File:Zemourgeral's_Fort_HighRes.png|250x250px|right]] Description: The Fortress of the evil Mahjarrat Zemouregal. Reason: Replacement of this image. It's taken with the OoO, has MSAA x4 and I manually removed badly AA done by Jagex's algorythm =P, it also has a nice screensaver res. EDIT: For the ones saying "I don't like the angle", its about THE QUALITY, I had to tilt the camera to show the full building, I'm only doing this because I can't directly replace the image. * Support - As nomnomnator. ScionCrush 01:07, January 30, 2011 (UTC) * Support - Better angle. File:Hunter cape (t).png Sentra246File:Blue hallowe'en mask.png 01:09, January 30, 2011 (UTC) * Oppose - Although this one lets you see the whole building, the current image has this vibe I find really attracting, sorta like a horror film beginning. File:Honour.png Coelacanth0794 Talk File:Square sandwich.png 02:47, January 30, 2011 (UTC) * Support - Per nomnom. 222 talk 04:08, January 30, 2011 (UTC) * Weak support - Better, but a pity you cannot see the most rightern pillar. Fswe1 07:52, January 30, 2011 (UTC) * Oppose - I like the quality, but I don't like the angle. Suppa chuppa Talk 07:57, January 30, 2011 (UTC) * Support - And merge histories. No need for doopelcaet images.(Scion, next time upload to a host site please) left:9px;top:4px;">Jleft:25px;top:3px;">Oright:1px;bottom:4px;">Eleft:2px;bottom:5px;">Yright:4px;top:2px;">Tright:20px;bottom:7px;">Jright:5px;top:6px;">Eright:2px;bottom:3px;">5right:10px;bottom:5px;">0left:6px; top:6px;">Tleft:6px;top:4px;">Aleft:8px;top:3px;">Lright:4px;bottom:2px;">K pull my finger 11:42, January 30, 2011 (UTC) No need. If the nomination failes, the image can simply be deleted. Btw, host wiki has been deleted. :O Fswe1 13:22, January 30, 2011 (UTC) * Support - Better angle 13:15, January 30, 2011 (UTC) * Weak oppose - Granted, it's better quality, but it doesn't look as impressive from that angle. 13:26, January 30, 2011 (UTC) * Neutral - They're both very excellent images. The old one has greater detail and feeling, yet the new one shows the whole building. --クールネシトーク 13:47, January 30, 2011 (UTC) * Oppose - I don't like the angle. bad_fetustalk 18:20, January 30, 2011 (UTC) * Oppose - I don't like the angle, and it doesn't have that horror-looking feel to it like someone said. User:Urbancowgurl777/Signature 19:29, January 30, 2011 (UTC) * Oppose - I don't like the angle, and it's not as impressive as the other image File:Ring of kinship.png Ciphrius Kane File:Dungeoneering cape (t).png 16:28, January 31, 2011 (UTC) * Comment - Scion, why do you think that "I don't like the angle" is not a valid comment? Multiple factors, including the quality of the image and the angle at which it was taken, play into whether or not an image is deemed worthy of being featured. Suppa chuppa Talk 20:29, January 31, 2011 (UTC) * Because I'm not doing this for the image to be shown but rather to be able to replace it for a higher quality one, the angle has nothing to do; if anything the "I dont like the angle" discourages me from changing multiple scenary images I've already taken wich a FIGM's. ScionCrush 21:40, January 31, 2011 (UTC) * Well, your comments don't seem to be valid. Angle is very important in whether the image is better than the previous one. Yes, it may have more detail, but angle is also a factor. And don't be discouraged by the people complaining about the angle, not everyone has the same great taste as you do ;) 10:31, February 5, 2011 (UTC) * Neutral - They're both great images, and I honestly don't notice much of a difference, so meh. File:Farming cape (t).png Lil cloud 9 Talk 05:26, February 1, 2011 (UTC) * Notice of intent - Deadline of nomination extended by a week to 13 February 2011. C.ChiamTalk 08:39, February 6, 2011 (UTC) * Support - Quality is BEAUTIFUL, but the angle ruins it...If the angle was correct, would've given it an AWESOME Support... 12:47, February 7, 2011 (UTC) * Comment - When I took images of Brambickle, I decided to go to the fort. I've taken a front view image with the same quality as this one and the entire building is visible. I'll nominate it after this has passed. Fswe1 07:30, February 12, 2011 (UTC) * Closed - File:X mark.svg Nomination for replacement is unsuccessful; lack of consensus. C.ChiamTalk 07:38, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software