About: Wotwiki talk:Category index/archive   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

I personally think that Wikipedia's Categorization policy is too strict (i.e., that if it's in a child category such as "Channelers", it can't be in the parent category "People" too). I think this will make things harder to find on a specialized wiki. I'd rather see us crosslink things where it makes sense to do so, and work with a better layout of categories to begin with...Wikipedia had a disadvantage in that they only acquierd the Categories technology a short time ago, after most of their articles were written, I believe. nae'blis (talk) 21:09, 24 Oct 2005 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Wotwiki talk:Category index/archive
rdfs:comment
  • I personally think that Wikipedia's Categorization policy is too strict (i.e., that if it's in a child category such as "Channelers", it can't be in the parent category "People" too). I think this will make things harder to find on a specialized wiki. I'd rather see us crosslink things where it makes sense to do so, and work with a better layout of categories to begin with...Wikipedia had a disadvantage in that they only acquierd the Categories technology a short time ago, after most of their articles were written, I believe. nae'blis (talk) 21:09, 24 Oct 2005 (UTC)
dbkwik:wot/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • I personally think that Wikipedia's Categorization policy is too strict (i.e., that if it's in a child category such as "Channelers", it can't be in the parent category "People" too). I think this will make things harder to find on a specialized wiki. I'd rather see us crosslink things where it makes sense to do so, and work with a better layout of categories to begin with...Wikipedia had a disadvantage in that they only acquierd the Categories technology a short time ago, after most of their articles were written, I believe. nae'blis (talk) 21:09, 24 Oct 2005 (UTC) * Agreed on both counts. But I'm not sure how often it will be useful to dual-categorize something into the parent category of one of its categories. I'm not against it happening, I just don't see it becomming pervasive. --Gherald 21:26, 24 Oct 2005 (UTC) * You know, this was one of those things that occurred to me while I was contemplating categorization schemes, and now that I'm here, I'm hard-pressed to think of an example. I think the nationality/cities in nations stuff may be the most troublesome thing so far... nae'blis (talk) 14:24, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software