About: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Addition   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

This is a little short, but I like the length actually. I rewrote this after it got deleted on VFD. Just looking for the normal, where its good, where it needs work, and how to help it out. 14:48, 13 August 2008 (UTC) ah, joining me on my quest to rid of terribleness and bring it to its rightful glory, where it shall be revered and feared? awesome!

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Addition
rdfs:comment
  • This is a little short, but I like the length actually. I rewrote this after it got deleted on VFD. Just looking for the normal, where its good, where it needs work, and how to help it out. 14:48, 13 August 2008 (UTC) ah, joining me on my quest to rid of terribleness and bring it to its rightful glory, where it shall be revered and feared? awesome!
dcterms:subject
Mcomment
  • average!
Pcomment
  • you have a bunch of redlinks. the formatting was fine for a math psuedo-stub. i like the length also; any less and it would be worthless, any more and it would be tedious. both your images were kind of squished up the top. your grammar and spelling need some work, try running this article by UN:PS.
Icomment
  • images were ok. i think a better caption for the ted image wouldn't be too hard to come up with.
Pscore
  • 6(xsd:integer)
Ccomment
  • 5(xsd:integer)
Cscore
  • 8(xsd:double)
Mscore
  • 7(xsd:double)
Hcomment
  • average of sections *intro: 8 ha! i lolled a little bit. as i was the nominator of the original terrible article, i read it several times, and this intro, while siliar, is much better. *another example: 7 again, very solid. i like the idea of going too far into the specific example, but don't get bogged down by it too much. the last line, you kind of pulled 'four' and 'five' out of nowhere, unless i missed something. try to make the example more coherent and make it flow better, and it'll work nicely. *fine i'll come get you: 9 haha, this was much better, the equation was very classic. *ok i'm here: 7 i like the reversal here, but again, the equation kind of puzzled me. make it nice and simple, just like out of a first grade math book.
Iscore
  • 6(xsd:integer)
Hscore
  • 7(xsd:double)
Fcomment
  • my preview button tells me that your score is 35.4, placing your article right at the 'adequate, the average article' step on the ladder. i think this is certainly worthy of inclusion in my eventual goal of a totally awesome :Template:Math. i recommend deredlinkifying, cleaning up some of the more complex stuff in the math problems, and moving the second image to a better location. certainly a solid job, sir, my hat is off to you!
dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate
Signature
  • --08-13
abstract
  • This is a little short, but I like the length actually. I rewrote this after it got deleted on VFD. Just looking for the normal, where its good, where it needs work, and how to help it out. 14:48, 13 August 2008 (UTC) ah, joining me on my quest to rid of terribleness and bring it to its rightful glory, where it shall be revered and feared? awesome!
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software