Should we put one of these on the FA page? I think it worked well on the Improvement Drive page. What do you guys think? Skywalka 07:09, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
* It wouldn't make sense in the context of how FAs are chosen. Unlike Improvement Drive articles, an FA is not just chosen because it has the most votes. If an FA has 5 votes and no objections, it automatically goes in the FA queue. If there are any objections, they must be resolved before it can be added to the queue. So there is no need for rankings, because theoretically any number of articles could be added per week if they had no objections and 5 votes. Does that make sense? - Breathesgelatin 07:15, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
* Yep, thanks. I guess this isn't really needed then. Sorry, I wasn't aware of how the FA's were choosen. S
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Forum:SH Archive/A 'Current Rankings' thing for the Featured Articles page?
|
| rdfs:comment
| - Should we put one of these on the FA page? I think it worked well on the Improvement Drive page. What do you guys think? Skywalka 07:09, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
* It wouldn't make sense in the context of how FAs are chosen. Unlike Improvement Drive articles, an FA is not just chosen because it has the most votes. If an FA has 5 votes and no objections, it automatically goes in the FA queue. If there are any objections, they must be resolved before it can be added to the queue. So there is no need for rankings, because theoretically any number of articles could be added per week if they had no objections and 5 votes. Does that make sense? - Breathesgelatin 07:15, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
* Yep, thanks. I guess this isn't really needed then. Sorry, I wasn't aware of how the FA's were choosen. S
|
| dcterms:subject
| |
| dbkwik:starwars/pr...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| abstract
| - Should we put one of these on the FA page? I think it worked well on the Improvement Drive page. What do you guys think? Skywalka 07:09, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
* It wouldn't make sense in the context of how FAs are chosen. Unlike Improvement Drive articles, an FA is not just chosen because it has the most votes. If an FA has 5 votes and no objections, it automatically goes in the FA queue. If there are any objections, they must be resolved before it can be added to the queue. So there is no need for rankings, because theoretically any number of articles could be added per week if they had no objections and 5 votes. Does that make sense? - Breathesgelatin 07:15, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
* Yep, thanks. I guess this isn't really needed then. Sorry, I wasn't aware of how the FA's were choosen. Skywalka 07:17, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
* No need to apologize! :) - Breathesgelatin 07:19, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
* Oh, ok. I guess I should have read the text before the voting area. Skywalka 07:21, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)