| rdfs:comment
| - I had an idea. As I said above, I think you guys have been doing a great job. While I am not interested in a lot of the events, you guys have been doing a good breadth of events and (from what I can tell) been trying to vary the times to accommodate everyone. My idea is that you guys could issue a report. This is just an idea, motivated by my desire to have things clearly explained instead of just 'eh...' If you could consider it, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. 01:13, May 26, 2011 (UTC)
|
| abstract
| - I had an idea. As I said above, I think you guys have been doing a great job. While I am not interested in a lot of the events, you guys have been doing a good breadth of events and (from what I can tell) been trying to vary the times to accommodate everyone. My idea is that you guys could issue a report. Where you guys stand, how things have worked out in the past and how you want to approach the future. Maybe defining the timetables you guys try to use on when to hold events; for example, this new Midweek training! has popped up, notably in combination with a weekend event. Does this mean you plant to hold mid-week as well as weekend events? Outlining how you guys are going to schedule things in the future would be neat. You could outline any support you think you guys need (such as more prominent advertising on the main page), or if you want to change anything about how the ET works. Also, maybe it could address how you guys see your membership working. The creation of the ET was kind of haphazard: we didn't really know how it was going to work down the road. That was a good course of action: better to get one running before hammering out the details. But we've have several weeks of solid performance, so I think it's time to clarify what is going to happen. We recently had a thread about this (Forum:New ET members), but even that closure was kind of vague (Both the ET and the community will have a say in the recruitment of future ET members). Do you guys see yourself on terms, or are you on the team until you decide to retire for whatever reason? Is there going to be a fixed number of members? I think it would be good to outline these things so that we're not flying by the seat of our pants in the future when we're actually in a crunch on needing more members. This is just an idea, motivated by my desire to have things clearly explained instead of just 'eh...' If you could consider it, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. 01:13, May 26, 2011 (UTC) We have been talking about what to do if someone retires/quits and if we want a set number of people. What it's really coming down to is - if we need help with events, we'll work on some sort of recruitment process (which we'll have to visit again later down the road because, as you said, the closing of that thread was vague). At the moment, even with the recent loss of a team member, we seem to be able to hold our own. The number of people, in my opinion, doesn't matter - the capability of each member does. Hmm, what do you mean by defining timetables? Like a calendar? We have that, it's just out of date. (: Or do you mean having a table of definite times? About the report - interesting idea. (: Perhaps a news section? User:Urbancowgurl777/Signature 01:19, May 26, 2011 (UTC) I'd love to make you a report about where we're at, what's planned, what we're planning to do and all that, but it'd be accurate for about 3 days... even as i write this ive got about a hundred ideas floating around and i'll arbitrarily pick one and implement it (often despite protests by others :D). We're just not settled enough to deal with things like 'consistency' :L Yes, i plan to keep creating mid-week events in the foreseeable future. Subject to random changes ofcourse :P And when i feel we need more advertising or certain changes ill just go bother one of the admins until they do it for me. After this i might actually go blackmail Joey into doing some coding work for me. At the start, i was under the impression that we'd have around 10 weeks and then we'd do some sort of shuffle to 'prevent elitism' as cook put it. Buuuut it appears that either everyone has forgotten about it or are too lazy to start a YG to put it into effect. But another thing to consider is, who would replace us? The last YG made it clear that we'd have a partial say in nominees along with the community so we've put our heads together and made a list of possible users... We couldn't agree on anybody, not even a 3/5 vote... So i guess it's up to you guys to come up with a shortlist in the aforementioned YG thread. So yeah... for now we're sticking with "eh..." - [Pharos] 07:38, May 26, 2011 (UTC)
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)