About: PvXwiki talk:Requests for adminship/Athrun Feya   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Care to explain what you mean/Want Lau to be able to do? As far as I'm aware there's little need for someone to be an admin to clear a section up (beyond WELL/Deletes which are sorted promptly anyway) ~ PheNaxKian talk 19:02, January 31, 2010 (UTC) Hey, I'd just like everyone to read my acceptance, hopefully it'll clear things up. - AthrunFeya - 19:35, January 31, 2010 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • PvXwiki talk:Requests for adminship/Athrun Feya
rdfs:comment
  • Care to explain what you mean/Want Lau to be able to do? As far as I'm aware there's little need for someone to be an admin to clear a section up (beyond WELL/Deletes which are sorted promptly anyway) ~ PheNaxKian talk 19:02, January 31, 2010 (UTC) Hey, I'd just like everyone to read my acceptance, hopefully it'll clear things up. - AthrunFeya - 19:35, January 31, 2010 (UTC)
dbkwik:pvx/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Care to explain what you mean/Want Lau to be able to do? As far as I'm aware there's little need for someone to be an admin to clear a section up (beyond WELL/Deletes which are sorted promptly anyway) ~ PheNaxKian talk 19:02, January 31, 2010 (UTC) BM duties, someone who can actually tell if votes are faulty etc, and she'll naturally stalk the paeges so she can intervene if anything runs out of hands. --Chaos -- 19:11, January 31, 2010 (UTC) Admins aren't supposed to go around BMing now...We remove Troll/Blatantly incorrect votes, other votes you argue amongst yourselves. ~ PheNaxKian talk 19:14, January 31, 2010 (UTC) I believe the line between blatantly incorrect and regular BM duties is very fading. Also, she'd make a strong admin. OCD and fairly balanced. --Chaos -- 19:22, January 31, 2010 (UTC) ocd isnt an argument for adminship, and no its not fading, a vote could bo non-troll and just bad, but auron wants admins to not remove those types of votes, so a bm-admin isn't needed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gringo (talk • contribs) (UTC). 19:25, January 31, 2010 (UTC) aren't you the one who was worried about not having anyone who could properly patrol builds? ··· Danny So Cute 19:29, 31 January 2010 (UTC) wasn't i the one worried people would want bm-admins and they would abuse vote removals? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gringo (talk • contribs) (UTC). 19:29, January 31, 2010 (UTC) you were actually worried Admins would start BM-ing, not BMs admin-ing, but we're getting off topic here. ~ PheNaxKian talk 19:33, January 31, 2010 (UTC) ^ now, i wonder what an admin who used to be a bm would be like. ups. ··· Danny So Cute 19:34, 31 January 2010 (UTC) Not alone, but it is one still. OCD was the sole reason for Toraen's RfA. --Chaos -- 19:46, January 31, 2010 (UTC) basically, lau obv does know builds, and this wouldn't be the first time we'd ever had an admin who was promoted to largely take care of build duties. not to mention, she's pretty level-headed and she's already shown she's not terrible at handling responsibility. i see no reason to not have an admin who knows enough about builds to put a firm hand down when necessary, and who also has a genuine interest in cleaning this wiki up and helping out users when they don't make asses out of themselves. ··· Danny So Cute 19:33, 31 January 2010 (UTC) Hey, I'd just like everyone to read my acceptance, hopefully it'll clear things up. - AthrunFeya - 19:35, January 31, 2010 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software