About: Simple Darthipedia:Sarlacc Pit archive/Nomi Sunrider   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Nomi could make a decent article. But in this form it's likely to get BAHLEETED..Anyone any ideas?? Madclaw Image:Darth Animal.JPG Shyriiwook! 19:39, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 1. * Indeed, someone could make it a decent article if they are willing. But at the moment I think we can agree that most of us are too lazy to try anything. :-) Probably kill it, and we can always bring it back if anyone has a good idea. Master GumpLord of Poodoo 19:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 2. * Kill it and let someone else do better Enochf 06:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 3. * I agree. It can be revived by a better writer latter, but right now its not up to snuff. The Almighty NinjaImage:Rabies.jpg Talk 22:53, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Simple Darthipedia:Sarlacc Pit archive/Nomi Sunrider
rdfs:comment
  • Nomi could make a decent article. But in this form it's likely to get BAHLEETED..Anyone any ideas?? Madclaw Image:Darth Animal.JPG Shyriiwook! 19:39, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 1. * Indeed, someone could make it a decent article if they are willing. But at the moment I think we can agree that most of us are too lazy to try anything. :-) Probably kill it, and we can always bring it back if anyone has a good idea. Master GumpLord of Poodoo 19:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 2. * Kill it and let someone else do better Enochf 06:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 3. * I agree. It can be revived by a better writer latter, but right now its not up to snuff. The Almighty NinjaImage:Rabies.jpg Talk 22:53, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:darth/prope...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Nomi could make a decent article. But in this form it's likely to get BAHLEETED..Anyone any ideas?? Madclaw Image:Darth Animal.JPG Shyriiwook! 19:39, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 1. * Indeed, someone could make it a decent article if they are willing. But at the moment I think we can agree that most of us are too lazy to try anything. :-) Probably kill it, and we can always bring it back if anyone has a good idea. Master GumpLord of Poodoo 19:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 2. * Kill it and let someone else do better Enochf 06:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC) 3. * I agree. It can be revived by a better writer latter, but right now its not up to snuff. The Almighty NinjaImage:Rabies.jpg Talk 22:53, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software