About: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Become famous in deviantART   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

this article is my first one and i had improved it.the quotes are shown to demonstrate how bad DA's critics are.--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 06:35, August 4, 2011 (UTC) Please?--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 04:49, August 11, 2011 (UTC) Anybody Here?--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 10:14, August 6, 2011 (UTC) If people click on a link that looks fairly interesting, the first thing they are probably not going to want to see an explicit picture of a Pikachu. Maybe put it at the bottom of the page. --Bookthief 12:45, August 12, 2011 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Become famous in deviantART
rdfs:comment
  • this article is my first one and i had improved it.the quotes are shown to demonstrate how bad DA's critics are.--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 06:35, August 4, 2011 (UTC) Please?--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 04:49, August 11, 2011 (UTC) Anybody Here?--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 10:14, August 6, 2011 (UTC) If people click on a link that looks fairly interesting, the first thing they are probably not going to want to see an explicit picture of a Pikachu. Maybe put it at the bottom of the page. --Bookthief 12:45, August 12, 2011 (UTC)
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • this article is my first one and i had improved it.the quotes are shown to demonstrate how bad DA's critics are.--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 06:35, August 4, 2011 (UTC) Please?--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 04:49, August 11, 2011 (UTC) Anybody Here?--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 10:14, August 6, 2011 (UTC) If people click on a link that looks fairly interesting, the first thing they are probably not going to want to see an explicit picture of a Pikachu. Maybe put it at the bottom of the page. --Bookthief 12:45, August 12, 2011 (UTC) User:Mr-ex777, even if it is intended as the source of the joke, it may be something to consider about the joke itself if the fellow doesn't see it that way. Honestly, from the sound of it, I wouldn't be inclined to see it that way, either - annoying the reader usually isn't the best way to amuse them. Usually it just annoys them. But I'll leave this to whoever reviews it; they may be able to say something more... actually useful. Something to consider instead, perhaps. 00:23, 13 August 2011 Ghah, screw it, I'll just review this myself. Right now. Yes. Even though I feel slightly ill and haven't slept. So... uh... sorry in advance for anything I might say?
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software