About: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Not Give A Shit   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Hey, maybe you will give enough shit to want to review this. But if all you want to do is bash it, I don't give a shit about what you have to say. (ok, maybe I do. For the sake of making this article better.) SaltyKid 13:52, September 26, 2009 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Not Give A Shit
rdfs:comment
  • Hey, maybe you will give enough shit to want to review this. But if all you want to do is bash it, I don't give a shit about what you have to say. (ok, maybe I do. For the sake of making this article better.) SaltyKid 13:52, September 26, 2009 (UTC)
dcterms:subject
Mcomment
  • The sections are too short and could be made a little bit longer. Make your not-giving-a-shit a little more elaborate and wordy to make sections longer and then when you get to "Will this article... really help me?" you can keep the short sections as is.
Pcomment
  • The grammar is a bit rough in parts of the preamble. "You got" should be "You've got" if using present tense. You don't need to capitalize every word in the headlines; it's a little hard on the eyes. Also, it could use a few more links, maybe "your life sucks" should link to George W. Bush or Kevin Federline or Paris Hilton.
Icomment
  • Some of the images don't really serve the article that well. Maybe replace Freddie Mercury with a really random picture or make your own over-the-top, don't-give-a-shit image using Photoshop, GIMP, or MS Paint if you must; I'd prefer GIMP since it's free and doesn't suck like MS Paint. The giraffe/graph was funny, but was also used in the Krusty Krab Training Video episode of Spongebob. It also could have used more images and more captains, maybe a funny one-liner -- those can easily make or break an image.
Pscore
  • 9(xsd:integer)
Ccomment
  • I liked the concept of teaching people how to not give a shit, despite not giving a shit yourself. That's probably the artcle's strongest asset, in my opinion. It just needs a little bit better execution.
Cscore
  • 10(xsd:integer)
Mscore
  • 9(xsd:integer)
Hcomment
  • Some of the jokes could have been fleshed out and made funnier. For example, "Well then you must be dumber than a box of rocks" can be changed to "Well then you must be dumber than a " so that it is always a random and different noun every time you read it. Also, fat cops are all too common. Why not something a little out of the ordinary, such as an Amish Heavy metal singer or an anorexic chef; maybe "just think " or something.
Iscore
  • 6(xsd:integer)
Hscore
  • 7(xsd:integer)
Fcomment
  • I didn't see any other problems with the article. It's a great article, it just needs a little improvement. You should start by reading HTBFANJS and Beginner's Guide again, and checking out Uncyclopedia:Best of for some inspiration. Good luck with it.
dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate
Signature
  • --09-26
abstract
  • Hey, maybe you will give enough shit to want to review this. But if all you want to do is bash it, I don't give a shit about what you have to say. (ok, maybe I do. For the sake of making this article better.) SaltyKid 13:52, September 26, 2009 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software