About: Articles for deletion/The Truth About Forever   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

This article has worn a since July 2009. No assertion of notability is made in the article. A Google search for ("truth about forever" dessen) yielded lots of hits, but the vast majority were either bookseller sites or fan blogs. I found a one-paragraph review at Kirkus Reviews; another one-paragraph review at Publishers Weekly; and a five-paragraph review (whose final paragraph was a single sentence) in The Family Magazine of Michiana. However, there doesn't appear to be any in-depth coverage in national media. To me, this appears to fail WP:GNG. Ammodramus (talk) 19:36, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Articles for deletion/The Truth About Forever
rdfs:comment
  • This article has worn a since July 2009. No assertion of notability is made in the article. A Google search for ("truth about forever" dessen) yielded lots of hits, but the vast majority were either bookseller sites or fan blogs. I found a one-paragraph review at Kirkus Reviews; another one-paragraph review at Publishers Weekly; and a five-paragraph review (whose final paragraph was a single sentence) in The Family Magazine of Michiana. However, there doesn't appear to be any in-depth coverage in national media. To me, this appears to fail WP:GNG. Ammodramus (talk) 19:36, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:speedydelet...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • This article has worn a since July 2009. No assertion of notability is made in the article. A Google search for ("truth about forever" dessen) yielded lots of hits, but the vast majority were either bookseller sites or fan blogs. I found a one-paragraph review at Kirkus Reviews; another one-paragraph review at Publishers Weekly; and a five-paragraph review (whose final paragraph was a single sentence) in The Family Magazine of Michiana. However, there doesn't appear to be any in-depth coverage in national media. To me, this appears to fail WP:GNG. Ammodramus (talk) 19:36, 13 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 14 June 2012 (UTC) * Keep. I found some other reviews and it looks like this is also being used pretty heavily in many schools' summer reading lists and in classes.[1], [2], [3], [4]Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:32, 14 June 2012 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 20 June 2012 (UTC) * Keep per Tokyogirl79. It's no War and Peace, but it's a book of above-average notability from a definitely notable author. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 10:45, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software